<p>Dad, </p>
<p>I understand your perspective, but please see ours too. You did state several things, perhaps because you felt outnumbered, or attacked, that were just not true. I don’t think you knew you were spreading misinformation, but you did, so you have to expect a response from those of us who love UA and want to help others learn more about it. I don’t have a problem with you posting here, as long as you keep it accurate, and respectful. </p>
<p>Perhaps we are a bit oversensitive, but UA has been the victim of misinformation for years from AU people. For example, many AU people I know like to insinuate that AU is more selective, without offering objective proof, or appreciating the different demographics, number of applicants, yield rates, etc. Hopefully even worse tactics, like warnings about mythical higher crime rates in Tuscaloosa, with racist overtones, have been set aside by the AU people. Because UA bears the state’s name, it has had a more negative rep than AU. Not bearing the state’s name has shielded AU to some degree from that rep. </p>
<p>I think it would be fair to say that some AU people feel the same about us when UA people refer to AU as “The barn”, or the “cow college”, as if it did not have a great science and engineering program. The difference I guess, from my perspective, is that people who don’t really understand what steps UA has taken to improve itself, are not the best judges of UA. </p>
<p>Anyone who steps on UA’s campus can see for themselves that great strides have been made in advancing UA, so perhaps we should not be too sensitive. But inaccurate statements, combined with preexisting stereotypes about Alabama, could prevent impressionable students and parents from even considering UA. </p>
<p>If you felt attacked, I apologize, but try to understand that some of what you wrote did come off as rude, and much of it was simply inaccurate. </p>
<p>I have said before, this kind of rivalry is what happens when you have two proud institutions in a relatively poor state.</p>