Accuracy for USH INSANE trend

<p>How accurate is sparknotes for ush
test 1:580
test 2:640
test 3:760
I did read alot and I still am reading alot from REA and SP but this trend was in one week so im not sure to trust it cuz today i went through a barrons AP ush book and the questions were more difficult >_<</p>

<p>Here’s the scores I got:</p>

<p>Test 2: 640
Test 3: 630
Test 4: 640
Test 5: 750</p>

<p>I did quite a bit of reading between test 4 and test 5 since I was still quite a bit below my target score. I got a 770 in the real test shortly after taking the last test.</p>

<p>So, all in all, the SparkNotes scores aren’t too unreliable. Barron’s is notoriously hard, so I wouldn’t worry about doing bad on those - I was getting in the low 600s in them.</p>

<p>Thank You.
Yea I figured Barrons was different because of there question difficulty so hopefully ill be prepared for May. I am planning to take all the SP tests and kaplan tests and hopefully get 750+</p>

<p>I capped at a 720 on Sparknotes (minimum 690) and got an 800, so they really aren’t that accurate.</p>

<p>i also got a 700 on barrons (64 raw) how would that translate to the real</p>

<p>So is the general consensus that sparknotes is harder than the SAT II because scores are deflated or what? Because my scores on the sparknotes so far are:</p>

<p>Test 1: 530 (I took this when my class was only up to WWI)
Test 2: 680</p>

<p>I plan on taking one more this week but idk if it’s even worth it.</p>

<p>About how close is the Princeton review book to the actual test in terms of difficulty? On Barrons review tests i get between 680-700 and then I took a princeton test yesterday and i got a 780</p>