<p>I took the ACT with writing for my first time a few months ago and scored a 35 composite. However, my writing score was fairly low (6), although I did get a 35 on the English portion of the multiple choice.</p>
<p>My question is: should I leave these scores (first and only scores) and try and kill on the essays or take the ACT with writing a second time?</p>
<p>I would recommend you take it a second time. Most students take it at least twice, so as long as you’re ready to kill the essay the second time (and haven’t let go in the other subjects), you should see an improvement.</p>
<p>Thank you for the response. I do have a quick addition that I’m not sure will make a difference.</p>
<p>I am going into EE/CE and received a 36 on both the math and science sections. Does this have any effect on whether I should take it again?</p>
<p>Kind of same scores here: 35 composite with 36 on math and science, but 10 essay. I recommend you read this:</p>
<p>Stumbled upon an interesting MIT article. All who are worried about retaking scores, read this.</p>
<p>What’s the big deal about 40^2? | MIT Admissions</p>
<p>Okay, so I’m in the middle (towards the end) of a long day of reading right now, but I thought I’d take a quick break to tell you a little about the last application I read.</p>
<p>People make a big deal about test scores. No one seems to believe me when I tell them that when I’m reading an application, I just glance at the test scores to get a sense of them before moving on to the more important parts of the application – that is, who you are. But here’s an example. So, I’m reading this application of a student, a pretty strong student, who’s definitely overcome some challenges recently. I come to the second to last piece in the folder, which is the guidance counselor letter (the last piece is the interview report). The GC makes a big deal of the student’s “scoring the magic 1600 on the SAT.” Now, when I started the case, I mentally noted to myself, “Okay, this student has scores that are fine, let’s move on,” but it didn’t really make an impact on me that the student had “the magic 1600.” Yes, scoring a 1600 is something that you, your school, your parents, and your guidance counselor can be very proud of. But it’s not something I’m going to bust out my highlighter for, circle in big red pen, make it the focus of your case. In fact, I don’t think I have ever in my summary of a student used high standardized scores as an argument to admit that student.</p>
<p>I wanted to share this with you because this case was one concrete example of just how little we care about the small differences in competitive test scores. A student with “the magic 1600” is not implicitly better to us than a student with “the spellbinding 1400.” Scores are one tool we use to help us in admissions. And yes, your grades and test scores (especially your grades) are important. But as I have said in the past, what ultimately really matters to us is who you are, what qualities you bring to the table. We want people who are academically curious and passionate, people who will bring their various talents to MIT and share them with others, people who will be good roommates, good mentors, good friends. We do not admit test scores. We admit people.</p>
<p>Let me tell you one more story that I often relay. I was doing a regional reception in a city a few years back, and afterwards a student – we’ll call her Artemis – comes up to me and tells me that she has a 760 on the Math SAT. As I was about to tell her that her score was just fine, she keeps talking, to inform me that she was going to take the test again, since “clearly” her score was “too low.” I was like, “What!!!” I “ordered” Artemis to not take the Math SAT again, and instead to have a picnic on that Saturday. Because to us, a 760 math is the same as any higher score she could receive on the retest.</p>
<p>One of the reasons why I chose MIT was it was the first school I visited where my student host didn’t ask me what my SAT scores were. At MIT, people care about who you are, what you can do, what kind of stuff gets you excited. People at MIT don’t compare GPAs (I didn’t know any of my friends’ GPAs), don’t ask about your IQ, and SAT scores are so high school.</p>
<p>Finally, I’m sorry I’ve been neglecting your questions lately, but I’ve been quite busy. I do promise to get around to more of them as soon as I can. I’m sure you won’t mind if my focus over the next few weeks is on doing my absolute best to read your application.</p>
<p>When you get a 35 composite, you’re just wasting your time by taking the test again. No school takes a super score of the ACT and you shouldn’t waste your weekend trying to raise that score. Instead, enjoy your weekend.</p>
<p>Alright everyone thank you all so much! That’s it then. I think I will spend my time focusing on school work and the SAT II’s. Good luck with all of your endeavors everyone!</p>
<p>howmanyofme…it’s not the 35 that’s low. It’s the 6 on the essay, which is alarmingly low for someone scoring a 35. But good luck to you, 555IChip!</p>
<p>Most colleges will just see that 35, not the 6 on the essay. I know what your say, but an average score on the essay, with the calculated risk of scoring lower, does not constitute a retake by any means.</p>
<p>Guess it depends what colleges you’re shooting for. But if you have a 35, I’d expect places like the Ivies to be on your list…and Ivies do look at the essay score. So do other top schools.</p>
<p>True, there’s a chance of a lower score but probably not drastically lower. A good chance the writing score can come up though because it’s not hard to turn a 6 into an 8 or even a 10.</p>