Actual Results: 2011

<p>I'll start by giving GPA and SAT and other things that may have affected my admissions:</p>

<p>Unweighted GPA: 3.6
Weighted GPA: 4.2
AP Test Scores:</p>

<p>Language and Comp-5
US History- 5
Music Theory- 3 (really hard test)</p>

<p>SAT:
Verbal-780
Math-770
Writing-690</p>

<p>SAT 2's:</p>

<p>Lit-740
Math 2-750
US History- 780</p>

<p>Senior Year Courses:
Japanese 7-8
Music
International Relations/AP Government
AP Calculus AB
AP Psychology
AP Biology
AP Lit</p>

<p>Race/Gender:
White/Male</p>

<p>Extracurriculars (spelled incorrectly probably):
Squash: 4.0 level player, but i didnt push it as hard as a could, I wasn't trying to be recruited (biggest mistake)</p>

<p>Some volunteering at a local hospital, and instrumental music</p>

<p>Brief bio: I attend a good public High School in Southern California.</p>

<p>The actual colleges: </p>

<p>'Dream Schools' (read: no chance of actually getting in but would be nice if they randomly decided to accept a range of GPA's)</p>

<p>Columbia- rejected, wasn't really surprising, and knowing what I know now, it wouldn't be my first choice like it was at the beginning of the process (their squash team seems a little underwhelming). I think I applied as an Anthropology/ Cultural Studies Major</p>

<p>Williams- Knowing what I know now this would have been my first choice at the beginning, they have a great squash coach/team, and excellent academics obviously. I was rejected and I applied as anthro/cultural studies</p>

<p>'Reach Schools' (read: I think i worked hard enough to get in, but it didnt happen for me):
UC Berkeley- I was rejected initially and on appeal, I'm a decent writer, and I thought my letter appealing my rejection projected honesty and dedication, without complaining, but it didnt work out.</p>

<p>Haverford College- Knowing what I know now, this is the place I wish I was going next year, more than Columbia or Williams, more than Berkeley. The squash coach and the people on the squash team are really cool. I did everything i could just to get on the waitlist (using a family connection, meeting the squash coach, visiting the campus, etc), yesterday i received mail telling me they didnt have any space, im so disappointed and kind of defeated because I really tried to get in here.</p>

<p>UCLA- I didnt want to go to UCLA, way too close to home, but ill put it here because it qualifies, I was rejected, and im a little upset because other people at my high school go in who I felt were less qualified. However, I would not go to UCLA even had I been accepted, so good call from them to not accept me.</p>

<p>USC- read UCLA, same deal, other less qualified (imo) people at my school were accepted.</p>

<p>UCSD- I didnt really think of this as a reach school, i honestly thought I was assured acceptance, but I was offered the waitlist, whcih i passed on because San Diego is in SoCal, and I visited it and its kind of lame.</p>

<p>Safety Schools (I got accepted at these schools, and I knew I would):</p>

<p>UC Merced- surprise surprise
UC Riverside-see merced
UCSB- too many frat boys sorority girls, could have been fun, but not really my thing
UC Davis- Lovely campus, the nicest of the UC's, I visited and the town is really weak. I think i would only survive frosh year because thats the year you live on campus.
UC Irvine- ew, this school will ruin your life seriously, its like going back to high school, i know soooooo many people going there and i just smh and smile at them and tell them theyll have a great time, who am i to step on their dreams?
UC Santa Cruz- very beautiful campus, has all the great student housing options that Santa Barbara has, but with hippies (I like hippies) instead of the bro's. This is most where Im registered at, though I still have some time to decide on...</p>

<p>University of Oregon- i have till the 23rd of may to make up my mind, and i will probably visit on the 22nd. I hear conflicting things (hopefully someone can clarify): some people say U of O is on the up and up, buying good professors and recruiting good students. Others say its really not that great and that its 111th ranking in US News/world report says it all.</p>

<p>Summary: I am deciding between Santa Cruz which I like, and Oregon which I also like (no visit yet though), at both I would be looking to try to transfer somewhere else after frosh. Im just not satisfied with either. Major worries for santa cruz are that ill become a complacent slacker (you saw my grades, im not an amazing student, i get A's and B's in close to equal numbers, and santa cruz has a lazy culture in some respects) and that ill ruin my chances of getting a transfer somewhere. Also very important (perhaps more important than UCSC vs U of O), I wasnt accepted from the waitlist at Haverford, however what if someone who they did accept doesnt choose to attend/isnt able to attend, wouldnt I be a possibility for getting a spot if that happened? What can I do to even get a plausable shot of still being accepted there, because Haverford is where I want to be next year in all honesty. Thank you so much for reading all of this, and I look forward to all comments suggestions and questions.</p>

<p>I have enough money saved up (thanks to my grandmother, my parents were no help, but then thats probably normal) to have more than enough money for any UC/ out of state public school. At a private school I have enough money for 3 years, and I figure I can get a part time job to help pay for the last year (work all four years). My major would be something in the social sciences like anthropology, economics, statistics, or sociology. Im not sure what i want to do with my life, but working for an NGO in a third world country or becoming a constitutional lawyer are careers that seem attractive to me.</p>

<p>maybe this should be moved to the admissions hindsights and lessons learned board</p>

<p>First of all, congrats on your acceptances and sorry to hear about Haverford! I wish you good luck with your plans. Personally, I’d choose UCSC, but that is of course up to you.</p>

<p>Secondly, great thread! I think those of us who’ve made chance threads here in the past should probably post links to them and/or summaries of the responses, to help future generations of chancing gurus calibrate their algorithms :)</p>

<hr>

<p>Okay, here’s my thread:</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/what-my-chances/1058046-id-appreciate-your-input.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/what-my-chances/1058046-id-appreciate-your-input.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>And the schools I applied to were:</p>

<p>University of Chicago
Reed
Vassar
Mount Holyoke
Union College
Trinity U (TX)
DePauw U
Sewanee
Whitman</p>

<hr>

<p>This is my academic profile:</p>

<p>Gender: F
Location: international
College Class Year: 2015
High School: Private
High School Type: sends many grads to top schools
Will apply for financial aid: Yes</p>

<p>Academics:</p>

<p>GPA - Unweighted: 3.30</p>

<p>Scores:</p>

<p>SAT I Math: 770
SAT I Critical Reading: 780
SAT I Writing: 800
SAT II Literature: 800
SAT II French: 720</p>

<p>Extracurriculars:</p>

<p>Significant Extracurriculars: art & design, journalism & translation, drama & musical, psychology club, ecology club
Leadership positions: a couple, but ‘leadership’ is stretching it
Volunteer/Service Work: the school library, a community center
Honors and Awards: one essay award</p>

<hr>

<p>Most people who responded to my thread thought that Vassar & UChicago were my most obvious reaches. Some people said that applying for financial aid as an international would hurt me, and others said that most of the schools on my list should be easy because of my test scores.</p>

<p>I think the consensus was that I’d get into most of my schools–which was quite flattering, and isn’t this the whole point of this forum–with UChi and Vassar being the clear exceptions.</p>

<hr>

<p>Here are my actual results:</p>

<p>University of Chicago - waitlisted
Reed - accepted/attending
Vassar - rejected
Mount Holyoke - accepted
Union College - rejected
Trinity U (TX) - accepted
DePauw U - accepted
Sewanee - rejected
Whitman - waitlisted</p>

<hr>

<p>In conclusion, some people seemed to underestimate the difficulty of securing financial aid as an international and didn’t take it into account when they chanced me–I know that Sewanee rejected me because of money, and DePauw didn’t offer me enough aid. At the same time, strangely, UChicago didn’t reject me outright, which I consider a great success given my GPA and abysmal academic record (my transcript is not just full of Bs, nor does it reveal an upward trend; it’s a consistent record of Cs and Ds in the sciences and As and Bs in the humanities). Unsurprisingly, Vassar rejected me, though my awful CommonApp essay, which I changed for my other schools, didn’t help my case at all.</p>

<p>I will matriculate at one of my two top choices and am very happy with the way things turned out.</p>

<p>Reed is one of the most underrated schools in the country, if you’re a really passionate person, Reed is definitely the place for you to be. Academically and socially, I can get behind going to Reed 100%. Don’t take this the wrong way, but you definitely fit the student profile at Reed: really smart people who are overlooked because they aren’t outstanding in a traditional classroom settings (3.3 GPA). I’m not exactly a workhouse myself, far be it from me to call you a slacker. I’m sure you’ve done research about Reed, you don’t need me to tell you all the great things about it (im slightly jealous and regret not applying tbh). </p>

<p>I guess if you want input on the other schools, I know a few alumni from Mt. Holyoke that are cool people, I don’t know if the environment is your cup of tea (all women might be a drag) but there are interesting people there at least. I know a girl going to whitman, she is a nice person but not that cool to me at least.</p>

<p>Chicago is really interesting, its even more interesting that you applied there. I looked at the rest of your schools and i thought ‘one of these things is not like the others.’ You have to ask yourself if what you really want is to attend a relatively large school in a huge city, and based on where else you applied that doesn’t seem to be the case. The opportunities you will have in a city are obviously a huge incentive, but you were accepted by plenty of good schools, you should choose where you’d be most happy. I don’t know your political orientation, but UChi is probably less liberal than Holyoke, and obviously everywhere is less liberal than reed, but maybe you want an inside look at ‘the enemy.’ </p>

<p>I hope you find success wherever you end up, just don’t fall into the mindset of “i need to go the highest ranked school that accepts me.” I would have ended up at UCI, which would have been a complete and utter disaster.</p>

<p>Haha, thanks for the in-depth analysis! I’ve already deposited at Reed actually.</p>

<p>While Reed and UChicago are structurally different, they tend to attract similar types of people because of their reputations as life-of-the-mind incubators. So it’s not really that strange that they were my first choices, imo.</p>

<p>As for Mount Holyoke, the all-girls environment combined with the isolated location was a turn-off for me, but I think I would have been fine there if I hadn’t gotten into Reed. (Even though the only school that gave me pause when I was deciding was actually Trinity U–great weather, happy campus, no loans…)</p>

<p>I like big cities a lot, but I’m quite flexible when it comes to location and size, so that wasn’t really the deciding factor when I picked my schools.</p>

<p>Again, thanks for the lengthy comment, I enjoyed it :)</p>

<p>And don’t hesitate to call me a slacker; that’s what I was, in a sense. Or at least I didn’t apply myself in school at all. I fully intend to approach college differently, though.</p>