Advice from people who will read your apps

<p>I know many of you are busily finishing your applications, and the admissions committee is eager to read them. There are a few sentences worth of advice that is the most valuable thing anybody could have said to me when I was applying.</p>

<p>Remember that your application will be read by people. People like honesty, personality, and an exciting read. The most important suggestion I can make is -- make your application fun to go through. I can remember otherwise quite passable candidates who didn't get in because they came across as stuffy and generally lacking in vibrancy.</p>

<p>Be funny, if you can be (but don't force it). Be passionate, if you are. Don't force anything, in fact, but try very hard to treat the person on the other side of the process as someone you'd like to interest in a one-hour chat with you, as opposed to some sort of avatar of the academy who will judge your acheivements on an abstract scale of worthiness. Let your personality come through. It's one of your most valuable assets.</p>

<p>(Since we will be reading huge numbers of files, naturally you want to distinguish yourself from the rest in a way that will stick in the readers' minds. I assure you, despite what it may seem like in view of your high school/neighborhood/state, it is overwhelmingly unlikely that your grades/scores/activities/awards will be exceptional on their own. Unless you have placed or will place highly in an International Olympiad of some sort, you can be pretty sure that lots of people will have distinctions similar to yours. And -- this was weird for me to learn, way back when -- while a near-perfect GPA and a 1550+ SAT along with regional trophies may be extremely exceptional among the people you know of, this is approximately the <em>expectation</em> we have when opening every application. That this is the case in our applicant pool is mind-boggling, but true.</p>

<p>Don't let this intimidate you. We are favorably impressed with great scores, great grades, and awards. They do reflect well upon your drive and intellect. And not everyone who applies has great scores. But the previous paragraph was intended to make clear that those things typically don't <em>tip the scales</em>, since there are more people who have those qualities than people whom we can admit.)</p>

<p>The bottom line is, there are quite a few candidates for whom Caltech was numbers-wise a "reach" who will be here next year because the readers felt like this was someone they'd love to have a conversation with -- and hence would add a lot to the community. Let your application convey a person as opposed to a bundle of achievements. While you must have something to back up your enthusiasm for science and your shining personality (i.e. achievements) your qualities as a person usually tip the scales</p>

<p>As Galen said, in anything you do, always remember your audience.</p>

<p>:-) Good luck.</p>

<p>
[quote]

The bottom line is, there are quite a few candidates for whom Caltech was numbers-wise a "reach" who will be here next year because the readers felt like this was someone they'd love to have a conversation with -- and hence would add a lot to the community. Let your application convey a person as opposed to a bundle of achievements. While you must have something to back up your enthusiasm for science and your shining personality (i.e. achievements) your qualities as a person usually tip the scales.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I hope that would be the case for all of us. Thanks for your valuble time and encouragement in writing this post, Ben!</p>

<p>Yes, very informative stuff. I'll keep that in mind. :)</p>

<p>Thanks, Ben! :)</p>

<p>So is it ok to emphasize something other than math/science?</p>

<p>Make sure your passion for math and science is CLEAR --- that is foremost. If you feel that this is evident in your application, it is great to devote Essay 2 and other parts to what else makes you tick -- non-math/science activities are important, too.</p>

<p>thanks, you've been a great help</p>

<p>When does the committee actually start to read applications?</p>

<p>We'll probably start within two or three weeks and the heaviest time will be February.</p>

<p>(Back at Tech, whee.)</p>

<p>Can you keep an eye out for mine? Just kidding.</p>

<p>That was probably the best post I have every heard <em>tear</em>
HOpefully I can fall into one of those places where the numbers arent so great, but you still like math/sceince kinda thing. This is why I put that I'm a nice guy on the application. I wonder if I will have a better chance because I'm a pirate. arrrrrrr! Good luck Y'all </p>

<p>-Julian</p>

<p>thnx for the post!! i wish i had read this before i submitted my app..</p>

<p>Ben, any news from the admissions office about numbers for Early Action (# applicants/accepted/deferred/denied etc)?</p>

<p>Ben i am an international.My act score is30/sat2 800/800/760. I am editor of my school magazine. I was the most promising debator at a national level . Rank 3/300 What are my chances. Will u entertain my application.Someone told me 30 act are usually not even entertained at caltech. I am very sure of my essays</p>

<p>We will read your application, regardless of your ACT score. People with lower scores have been admitted. Overall the chances are slightly less than 50/50, but you will certainly get some profound and respectful consideration. We don't reject people based on scores alone, ever (unless they are below the national average or something).</p>

<p>The rest of your application sounds interesting.</p>

<p>How would you deal with applicants who are not engineering focussed but liberal arts focussed? I am thinking of established programs like mathematics and philosophy or physics and intellectual history. How would you assess whether such applicants, whose alternatives might be say Chicago, Princeton or Williams 'fit' Caltech and whether they would thrive there? I read a whole lot of impressive SAT scores on this site, but very seldom do I encounter a student who seem aware that science and mathematics are great intellectual adventures and that in the end it is the sharing of this experience with their peers which will determine whether they in fact will ever be first echelon scientists or glorified technicians</p>