<p>Who here supports it? Who doesn't?</p>
<p><em>not this again</em></p>
<p><em>sigh</em>
I think you are trying to provoke an argument-fest
I’ll start. I do not support it. There. Bash away people!</p>
<p><em>see above^^</em></p>
<p><em>likes writing stuff between asterisks</em></p>
<p>This is boring. Ok, I do support it now. Bash!</p>
<p>I was just wondering. What are your political views? Wait… There was another one of these threads before. I didn’t know that.</p>
<p>I am so sick of people bringing this **** up.</p>
<p>I am neither for nor against it. And to reiterate what the other posters on this thread have already said – not again!!</p>
<p>Against racial. Socioeconomic would be better.</p>
<p>^ Exactly what I was going to say.</p>
<p>I am generally apathetic toward affirmative action. <em>prepares for argument</em>
<em>does what rmadden and math+sci do by typing between asterisks</em></p>
<p>I support Affirmative Action.</p>
<p>
This .</p>
<p>I am against racially based affirmative action. It needs to be socioeconomically based, and never in a quota sort of way.</p>
<p>^^ Where have you been??? :O</p>
<p>somewhat against it. It makes it seem like Minorities aren’t smart enough and need a small push. If someone had to grow up in a tough background, no matter the circumstance they would excel. And there are very rich minorities and AA gets wasted on them and not the poor.</p>
<p>I think it should be based on socioeconomic like the above posts.</p>
<p>I DON’T LIKE.</p>
<p><em>blah blah blah</em></p>
<p>I think AA helps out A LOT. It should still be there.</p>
<p>Since it helps me out of course…even when i go to grad/law school duhhh 
lol j/k</p>
<p>definitely against it (racial AA), but something socioeconomic would be better</p>