Anderson Vs Haas by Businessweek.

<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/index.html#top30%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/04/index.html#top30&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>1 Northwestern
2 Chicago
3 Pennsylvania
4 Stanford
5 Harvard
6 Michigan
7 Cornell
8 Columbia
9 MIT
10 Dartmouth
11 Duke<br>
12 Virginia
13 NYU </p>

<p>14 UCLA </p>

<p>15 Carnegie Mellon
16 UNC Chapel-Hill </p>

<p>17 UC Berkeley </p>

<p>18 Indiana
19 Texas - Austin
20 Emory
21 Purdue </p>

<p>22 Yale </p>

<p>23 Washington U.
24 Notre Dame
25 Georgetown
26 Babson </p>

<p>27 Southern California </p>

<p>28 Maryland
29 Rochester
30 Vanderbilt</p>

<p>The rankings by Business Week doesnt necesarily mean that is what the recruiters go by. For that, we should look at starting salary... and that has Wharton,Harvard,Stanford and Berkeley on top.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.consusgroup.com/news/rankings/business_schools/bschool.asp%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.consusgroup.com/news/rankings/business_schools/bschool.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Rank
Institution
Score</p>

<p>1
The Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania)
1.000</p>

<p>2
Stanford Business School
0.963</p>

<p>3
Harvard Business School
0.961</p>

<p>4
The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business
0.833</p>

<p>5
Kellogg School of Management (Northwestern University)
0.819</p>

<p>6
MIT Sloan School of Management
0.812</p>

<p>7
Columbia Business School
0.791</p>

<p>8
Tuck School of Business (Dartmouth College)
0.735</p>

<p>9
University of Michigan Business School
0.734</p>

<p>10
The Anderson School (University of California, Los Angeles)
0.715</p>

<p>11
Darden Graduate School of Business (University of Virginia)
0.701</p>

<p>12
The Fuqua School of Business (Duke University)
0.700</p>

<p>13
Leonard N. Stern School of Business (New York University)
0.696</p>

<p>14
Haas School of Business (University of California, Berkeley)
0.681</p>

<p>15
Carnegie Mellon Graduate School of Industrial Administration
0.677</p>

<p>16
Yale School of Management
0.671</p>

<p>17
Kenan-Flagler Business School (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)
0.655</p>

<p>18
McCombs School of Business (University of Texas, Austin)
0.648</p>

<p>19
Johnson Graduate School of Management (Cornell University)
0.645</p>

<p>20
Marshall School of Business (University of Southern California)
0.633</p>

<p>Published Rankings: Published Rankings reflect current and historical ratings by numerous sources, including: Business Week, U.S. News, Gourman Report, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, Carrter Report, Business Education Commission, etc. An institution's aggregate published ranking comprises 50% of its overall score. </p>

<p>Selectivity: Selectivity measures the quality of business schools' admitted candidates. Selectivity is based on the percent of applicants admitted (40% of composite selectivity score), GMAT scores (35% of composite), and GPAs (25% of composite). An institution's composite selectivity comprises 25% of its overall score. </p>

<p>Salary: Salary measures historical and current starting salaries of a given school's graduates. Salary comprises 10% of an institution's overall score. </p>

<p>Placement: Placement measures historical and current success a given school has placing its graduates. Placement comprises 10% of an institution's overall score. </p>

<p>Yield: Yield reflects the percentage of admitted candidates that matriculate to the admitting university. An institution's yield comprises 5% of its overall score.</p>

<p>I don't understand UC bickering. I have always said that UCSD is the science equivalent of Cornell, and UCLA is better than Cornell and Brown.</p>

<p>What is with the infighting? Its time to tackle bigger fish.</p>

<p>because Hass has an undergraduate program, that takes the same Acctg 1 class with the grad students, its student-faculty ratio has always been high at the grad level. Thus, rankings that use student-faculty ratio typically rate Hass lower that schools w/o and undergrad program, i.e, UCLA, Stanford, et al. I'm not saying that Hass is as good or better than those two, but just pointing out we need to be careful when comparing rankings per se bcos it could be comparing apples and oranges.</p>