@Portercat We knew early on that the standardized tests would be the most difficult part of her application.
Our state requires the elementary and middle school students take ISTEP tests. When she took these tests we noticed that she did very well on the English, language arts and social studies sections but not so well in the math.
In middle school she earned a PASS+ on several sections of the test which earned her a spot in a program called NUMATS (Northwestern University Midwest Academic Talent Search). Being chosen for this program earned her an opportunity to take both the SAT and ACT twice in middle school. The results of these tests followed the same pattern as the ISTEP…difficulty with STEM topics.
We decided to take her out of public school and put her in a private full IB program for high school. Surprisingly, she tested into Higher Level (HL) Math and did well. In 9th and 10th grade the students took 10 classes which included math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, English, history, digital technology, a language (her language is French) and PE. While the program was definitely STEM heavy, it also allowed her to focus on her the liberal and performing arts. By the end of their 10 grade year the students had met the state requirements for math and science. In the 11th and 12th grade the students choose which science and math level they would focus on (she choose SL Biology and SL Math).
She graduated from the IB program with a 4.16 GPA and just earned the IB Diploma in July (the students earn their Core40 with Academic Honors by the end of April, then sit for three weeks of IB exams in May…they receive the IB exam results in July).
While her SAT/ACT scores increased, they were not good enough for all of the schools she was interested in. GW was her #1 choice based on the Elliott School, the University Honors Program and the location of the school. When she initially made her list of schools, GW was not test optional, but American University was. She was accepted to AU’s Global Scholars Program which is a 3 year BA/MBA program but received no merit which prompted me to contact admissions. In a roundabout way they said that she did not receive merit because she applied test optional AND she was admitted to a 3 year program…inferring that we would only be paying for 3 years not four (to which I responded “well, you have a good day”). GW did not go test optional until August 2015.
What set her apart was the resume she built throughout high school. While the highly selective schools she applied to reported ACT/SAT scores well above her range, she actually made it from EA to RD for several of them because of her resume. Wellesley College has an “early evaluation” process which gives the young ladies a “Likely, Possible and Unlikely”. She actually received a “possible” then was waitlisted even with her SAT scores.
I don’t believe high selective schools will ever move away from high SAT/ACT’s. She also applied to UChicago and the admissions officer was perplexed in his discussions with her and our guidance counselor. On the one hand her resume and on the other her scores. She made it from EA to RD but to accept her would pull done stats. She was accepted to Loyola University and received a sizable Damien Scholarship and was admitted to the Rome Start Program (1st year spent in Italy). She was also admitted to the University of Georgia where they add a full point to your GPA for each IB course but…she received no merit because of her test scores were not in their range for merit (UGA is not test optional).
I’ve come to learn that each test optional school has their own internal methods.
Here is the test optional list:
http://fairtest.org/university/optional