<p>i'm a 2nd year transfer student and i have been admitted to Cal poly Pomona as a Landscape Architecture. I also have been admitted to Kansas State University in Architecture program as well. The problem is i can't make the decision on which school should i go, or which one is better than the other in the way of academic system. the environment also a big different.</p>
<p>i lived in Riverside area, California which is pretty close to Cal poly, but the thing is i got accepted in Landscape aRch instead of Architecture program. there's some suggestion that i can go there for another 2 years and graduate with my landscape arch B.S. then get a M.S in Architecture for another 2 -3 years. is that true? is all Architecture program, it's 5 years program?</p>
<p>CAl poly accepted me as "Conditional" tho. </p>
<p>For, KSU the only thing is all transfer student have to be enroll in first year not the 2nd or 3rd year. 7 yrs for B.S is that's good idea? </p>
<p>i known that LAnscape ARch, and Architecture there is the big different between the two. Since i couldn't make any decision so far, plz if anyone has any suggestion</p>