<p>Apparently, we differ in opinion on the difficulty of the exam. However, I stand by my position - do not take this exam if you don’t have the time to devote to prepare for it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, I acknowledge that this is true.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I saw this list as well, but in my case found it unhelpful.</p>
<p>Perhaps the majority of differences in our views stem from our different learning techniques. What works for me may not work for you, and vice versa.</p>
<p>All in all, it is up to the student to decide whether or not to take the exam. I simply offered my frank opinion.</p>
<p>Here are the links to self-studying Art History that I found in recent months. Some of them offer advice which I will collate and post later on:</p>
<p>Ok. I was going to get help from a teacher over the summer and he never responded. Emailed twice and called once. So I guess I’m in the same boat as everyone else here. I have Barrons, The Annotated Mona Lisa, and Gardner’s. Now how the heck do I self study this thing? Should I focus on the history behind the art (like the teacher wanted me to) or just learn art for the sake of art? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.</p>
<p>Ok, I’m going to go ahead and take a stance between those of the main two posters. Self-studying for the AP Art History exam is a challenge, but it is certainly manageable if you have a decent history background. I got a 5 pretty easily (even though I didn’t technically self-study, the course was CLEARLY a self-study).</p>
<p>If you have a choice, take the class. I know that many are planning to self-study because a class is not an option - but I used the FLVS class, and as much as it was tedious and oversimplified, it FORCED me to work and read. It turned out to actually be pretty good at the end.</p>
<p>However, I don’t credit my success on the exam to FLVS. I mainly studied outside of the course and just used the class as a way to practice on essays. You don’t need a course for that. The principal books that I used were REA’s AP Art History (BY FAR THE BEST BOOK on the subject… those who don’t whole-heartedly recommend it just haven’t used it). I also skimmed a little of Barron’s. Larry Krieger, the author of the REA Art History book, is the genius behind the Crash Course series which targets what WILL be tested on the exam. For Art History, it’s really hard to create a Crash Course since nothing can arguably be condensed to less than 300 pages, but Krieger helped me answer probably about 85%-90% of the questions on the exam correctly. The book is also really, really funny.</p>
<p>The way I prepared for the essays was a little different. I created my own TOP 40 WORKS INVENTORY. I went through an art history textbook, the Barron’s book, and the REA book and selected works that I thought fit several different themes so I could have a set of works that applied to any essay they threw at me. I made sure 15 works were from beyond the European tradition. For each work, I typed up a page full of information, learning EVERY detail about it. When I opened up the essay packet, I was golden.</p>
<p>I am self studying this too!
I invested A LOT in this.
I bought used copies of Gardner’s Art Through The Ages 12th edition & Janson’s History of Art 6th ed.
Bought Annotated Mona Lisa, and Architecture by some author I forgot name.
Hey, I am thinking that I shouldn’t buy Annotated Arch, is this book useful for the exam? Since I have 2 textbooks, do I really need to read Arch?
I will buy REA Art History when the exam comes near.</p>
<p>^wow you sound really prepared. I’m buying my books not this weekend but the following I’m pretty sure Anyways, to 082349, do you think you’re still going to self-study this or switching to world?</p>
<p>I’m self-studying AP Art History along with AP Euro seeing as 80% of AP Art is Europe alone. I’m using the Gardner’s book and Annotated Mona Lisa for AP Art, and for AP Euro I’m using Norman Davies Europe and then a review book (undecided).</p>
<p>Does anybody have any recomendations for how to learn the analysis part? I already know how I’m going to study for the Multiple choice part, but I’m unsure on the essays. Would learning the terminology and methods of art help and then reading an professional analysis help me prepare? Also, I should probably write my own analysis as well. Maybe I could find a painting in my book that has been analyzed, analyze it on my own and then compare mine to the authors, or is the subject to open ended? Failing that I’ll just buy my AP Studio Art teacher a Starbucks card and ask him to read my essays.</p>
<p>^ Barron’s AP Art History prep book has a good amount of essay prompts to practice with. Also, they include sample responses to each essay prompt to give you an idea of what the graders expect. After each chapter, you can find vocabulary lists containing terminology you should know which will be incredibly helpful for the essay and MC sections. I got a 5 on the exam, and I read sample responses from Barron’s and high scoring essays from past AP exams. I don’t think reading professional art criticism will be necessary to pass or get a 5 on the exam.</p>
<p>Art history seems really tough and I have no idea why you all want to self study it. Most universities will not give credit anyways. And does having Art History really strengthen your app or does it just make you seem like a total nerd? Tough one…I think I’ll stick with psych as a self study.</p>
<p>You have a point about nothing being too nerdy for CC, but when I said “MOST” I meant it in a general sense, so using isolated examples to contradict me is absurd. Another AP that most universities will not except is Human Geography, but APHG teaches you a lot about culture and politics so I think it was worth my time.</p>