<p>Just got a 5 on the test, so I thought I might share some of my wisdom! :)</p>
<p>A lot of what I say may have been said previously, so take what you can get out of it:</p>
<p>Classes: I did take an AP Art History class at my high school. We used Gardner’s and started fairly slowly, covering everything up to about Romanesque art by the first semester and cramming everything after that into the second semester. Although we had a lot of mindless study guides that followed the textbook, the most important skill we learned was really being able to get down some basic info for any image in a short period of time (usually 5-10 minutes depending on the question.) Our teacher gave us 4 point short essays multiple times throughout a class period, asking for basic info such as artist, date, medium, location, patron and then a more specific question such as the significance of this art relative to its culture … something along those lines.</p>
<p>Now if your class doesn’t have this kind of structure or you’re planning on self studying, my biggest advice is to think of possible questions that could be asked about an image a habit. You don’t have to stop for 30 minutes and brainstorm questions for all 1000+ images you’ll be learning, but be able to have a general idea of what a test (specifically the AP test) could ask about the piece in question. Just by looking at the material that is written to accompany a piece, you can usually figure out what kind of question would prompt you to remember what is written already (kind of like Jeopardy?) This gets much easier with practice, but you’ll start to realize that some questions simply cannot be asked about some pieces. For example, you’ll rarely get a question about the artist of a piece from pieces pre-1000 or so (because there wasn’t very much documentation), but if you do, these artists (Iktinos, Kallikrates, Phidias, Imhotep, etc.) are usually stressed heavily and worth memorizing.</p>
<p>Books: I only used Gardners as my main textbook, so I can’t really comment on it compared to other texts. I’ll just say it was thorough and very, very heavy. For a main textbook, Gardners seems to be the standard, although the AP test does throw in A FEW questions from less popular books or sources in the multiple choice section. Do not worry about these stray questions – usually you can use process of elimination and you’ll be right. They also sometimes include a piece in the FRQ that you should NOT be familiar with already but should be able to make assumptions about based on whatever hints or info they give you. For example, I remember one old FRQ showed a picture of a very whitewashed, plain church which you did NOT have to identify, but you should have been able to associate it with the Calvinist tradition and talk about the significance and trends of Calvinism in architecture.</p>
<p>As for prep books:</p>
<p>REA: I think this was a fairly decent and concise prep book that covered the key points and offered a few extra pieces that were NOT found in Gardners or the Annotated Mona Lisa. This is a nice way to review casually before the AP test but should NOT be used as your main textbook, because it does not cover nearly enough images. The quick lists in the back are pretty helpful – take a week to make the most of them and they’ll surely pay off. My main gripe with REA is that the practice tests have questions that directly match up with the material presented in the book. Just quickly skimming the quick lists in the back after reading through the material will get you 100% on these tests just because they only test what they’ve taught you (which again, is NOT everything.) The tests are not accurate in that sense.</p>
<p>Annotated Mona Lisa: Really a fantastic book, even if you’re not studying. This is a great way to quickly study for tests (if you’re taking a class) or review the whole course if you’re prepping for the AP test. Packed with often interesting and scandalous information, this is a fantastic supplement to your studying. There are tons of great charts, tables and diagrams that clearly outline otherwise confusing Art History concepts and timelines. It’s worth the 12 dollars! Again, this should NOT be used as your main textbook.</p>
<p>Barrons: I did NOT use this book to study, as a lot of the material was WAY too hard. Even though Barrons is usually a great way to overprepare for a test, art history is different in that the material doesn’t really get conceptually harder but more DETAILED as you go. There is no freaking way you can learn all the minute details for such a broad course, so I advise you not to use Barrons… HOWEVER, if you do find a copy in the library or something, I will say that some of their charts are well organized and offer a quick way to hold a list of styles, artists, or dates for last minute cramming.</p>
<p>Studying: If you look at the percentage breakdown on the collegeboard website, you’ll see what to focus on. Although each year seems to have a different focus (2009 seemed to be medieval art and my year, 2010, seemed to be modern art?) these are still good guidelines to follow. Definitely do not spend extra time reviewing Asian/African/Oceanic art unless you just have oodles of time left… on my test, the very few questions that were relevant were really easy to use process of elimination on if you have any distinction between China/Japan/Korea and have even basic knowledge of the non-Western cultures. No worries! :)</p>
<p>For me, I just read through AML, REA and did a general overview of Gardners and the key artists and ideas of each chapter. If you can find a friend to do this with, it REALLY helps!</p>
<p>And lastly, my hint to you is to try to find the Art History SparkCharts online. It’s 6 pages and is extremely helpful. If not, I might find a way to get them to you. :)</p>
<p>Phew, that was long! If you have any other concerns or questions I’ll be happy to answer them by PM.</p>
<p>Happy studying!</p>