AP CALC BC 2005.... I know YOU took it!

<p>how stupid of me...
I can't believe I've been reading the AB threads... :-P</p>

<p>I thought this yr's exam was generally harder than previous yrs'.
I'd been doing sample exams for like past 8 yrs..and still I found this yr's much harder than ..at least the last three yrs.</p>

<p>MC part was manageable.. oh totally.
But ... I think I didnt do so well on the free response part..at all.
What did you think of the exam? Hard? a piece of cake (dammit!!)?</p>

<p>my two cents: the free reponse was faaaaaar easier than 2001-2005</p>

<p>just a little confused, you meant "Calc BC 2006", right? ;-)</p>

<p>mc = ehh..it wasn't incredibly difficult... i didn't know some things but i think i did decently on it..only skipped a couple</p>

<p>free response = hard for me because obviously our class is behind and hasn't gone over half of what we needed for it</p>

<p>o well...my college gives me 8 credit hours for 3, 4, and 5! :)</p>

<p>I got rocked by the test. I filled in answers (don't know if they're right) for the FR and MC was a doozy.</p>

<p>yea, FR was def easier than 2001-2005. noncalc MC was kinda hard for me. calc MC i thot was pretty easy.</p>

<p>I thought the FR was harder than 2001-2005... It was definitely harder than 97-99.</p>

<p>in the improper integral, do u write from 0 to infinity or lim of integral from 0 to a .</p>

<p>first question, how do u get to a chatroom
i thought i did well though, the mc w/o calc was tough! i left a few blank and didn't have enought time. The other stuff i thought was pretty easy. I'm expecting a 5</p>

<p>by definition, an improper integral has a bound as infinity or negative infinity (if type 1) or contains a y-value of +/- infinity within its bounds. Expressing it as a limit as t-> infinity makes it legit, and not so improper.</p>

<p>I took it...and I hope the grade distribution stays similar to what it was last year...</p>

<p>eh, i thought MC was easy. within the MC, the non-calc was harder than the calc by far.</p>

<p>as for the FR, i thought there were some tough letters to questions...they definitely stumped me, but let's just hope the curve is forgiving.</p>

<p>2005 mc was easy...got a 5 on bc last yr</p>

<p>i thought it was prety easily. I believe I only skipped 2 on the MC w/o calc and 1 on MC w/calc. The FR was straight forward at least and I certain I did decently on it. Although, some of my fellow students did think it was pretty though.</p>

<p>piece of cake....ROCKET B baby</p>

<p>ugh I thought the FR was HORRIBLE.</p>

<p>I was getting 5's on practice tests, and I was getting all my points from the FR... but I thought this year's FR was much harder.</p>

<p>oh well.</p>

<p>...I got Rocket A! lol</p>

<p>rocket B 51>49!</p>

<p>In my opinion...</p>

<p>FR #1 was easy. </p>

<p>FR #2 was okay, but a bit werd.</p>

<p>I forgot what I thought about FR #3 when I took it, but now that I look at it, it like FR #2, okay.</p>

<p>FR #4 was easy. </p>

<p>FR #5 was okay.</p>

<p>FR #6... I had no clue what's going on. Once I hit the last part of A, and B.</p>

<p>ahhhhhh 50?</p>

<p>hmm i hope that won't be such a big deduction...</p>