<p>i think #6 was tailor made for classes that actually took stats seriously and finished the curriculum. i think the schools that consider stats a blow off class got tripped up on this one but i could be wrong</p>
<p>The people who say #6 was hard was probably those who never got to the end of their stats book =P</p>
<p>We only went over it briefly in class too, so it was kind of iffy for me ... but I tried to make sense out of all the questions, and wasn't SO bad in the end. I think my answers were logical. =) i "think" anyway</p>
<p>i skimmed over it myself b/c my teacher never got to it, and i vaguely knew what it was about.. and only guessed at the process. hopefully i managed a few points on that one.</p>
<p>i have the priviledge of having Yates, the author of my textbook, teach us half the course. he lives only 30 minutes away. he came as a "guest speaker," basically whenever my stats teacher didnt feel like teaching...</p>
<p>Wow I can't believe Yates was your stats teacher. That's like... incredible. My teacher was good, but it seems like it would be so much more advantageous to have the author of the standard ap stats textbook as a teacher.</p>
<p>We never learned how to do it. Everyone in my class was all like "What was with #6?" to my teacher... cause we decided not to do Chapter 14 (The Practice of Statistics) because our teachers said they its usually not on the test which is what the question involved. I did the a and b, half of c (guessed) and was attempting d, but I know I got that one wrong and didn't finish.</p>
<p>My teacher said, "Usually Chapter ** is only a small part on the FRQ -- I wouldn't worry. But wouldn't it stink if you guys had a whole #6on it? Ha ha -- I don't thin that'd happen though."</p>
<p>This was her first time teaching the class, and she did a kick-ass job at doing all the other parts, so I don't really blame her. She did much better than the other stats teacher. </p>