<p>dfasfhasdfasdfahsdfjalshfa
dsfasdhfasjhdfalksjf
looked up the wrong value for #6 aahfsejhfaefahsejfdgkajerfa
SO CLOSE AND YET SO FAR</p>
<p>I thought #6 was easy with the formula given..</p>
<p>I thought the probability one on FR was hard and some MC got me =P</p>
<p>It was a chi-square problem. I never saw the equation before, but it's just plugging in two variables. I really don't think #6 was that hard.</p>
<p>Well, plugging in "n" was easy.
But "s" was difficult for people to know what it was.</p>
<p>I think that the probability one, part c was a trick question.
I put the same answer as b. It was my best guess.</p>
<p>The experiment design was lame. I hope BSing will be me a 1 or 2.</p>
<p>I admit s was a bit difficult to figure out, if they meant standard error or deviation, and if it was supposed to adapt to the sample size or not. But the rest was mostly unrelated to that question (C will result in failing to reject Ho in all of the scenarios I tested), so that wasn't too critical. The rest was pretty easy.</p>
<p>H0: I should not study for my stats test
Ha: I should. </p>
<p>Type II error. :(</p>
<p>Hahaha, marry me.</p>
<p>Type II error means you studied, assuming studying is a false mean.... >_></p>
<p>No, beta is mistakenly failing to reject Ho, aka mistakenly not studying for the test.</p>
<p>6 was prob something most people never studied but all you needed to know was there. If you understood what was going on in the first part then the rest should have followed naturally. If you knew the behavior of Chi-squared and the behavior of distributions in general, the problem would have been easy.</p>
<p>s could be had from entering the data into your calculator, I don't think they expected you to calculate it yourself.</p>
<p>I was under the impression that the number 6 FRQ is supposed to be something you've never seen before...just so they can test your true knowledge of the concepts.</p>
<p>basically, that test was the single most f<em>ed up thing ive ever encountered liek i basically gave up with 20 min to spare and almost cried. aka ppl were laughing when the test was done cuz no1 knew </em> to DO AND JESUC CHRIST I GOT OWNED BY PART IIs. variance and ocean depths that are negative can go F* themselves!</p>
<p>haha no- from past #6 FR, it's stuff I've seen before. This is the first time I've gone ***?!</p>
<h1>6... wow... I was clueless.</h1>
<p>And #3 was hard too.</p>
<p>The MC wasn't bad. The rest of the free response weren't bad (#1 and #2 were cake, #5 was easy, I breezed through them).</p>
<p>LOL, I thought everyone on this board gets 5's on AP Tests. I was getting 3's on my History and English tests. It's actually nice seeing other's having the same problems that I did. Maybe I did well! LOL</p>
<p>You guys weren't the only one's to make up answers, lol.</p>
<p>I agree orchdorkbando. That seems to be exactly what it was.</p>
<p>ill be lucky to get a 2, because after question 1, i went straight to 6, saw how difficult and retarded it was, and then just blanked out for the rest... wut with with labeling those histograms and w/e... o GOD</p>
<p>To be honest, I owe what inkling of knowledge I had this morning all to Barron's. Tell the kiddos taking stats next year to GET Barron's at the beginning of the year, and I swear, you'll be saving their lives..</p>
<p>Our textbook is the most convoluted, unnecessarily wordy piece of dung ever committed to paper.</p>
<p>Yeah, I got Barrons and it helped me a bit.</p>
<p>i knew the general formulas and methods that i thoughttt were needed.. but the way they worded the questions just was not testing ur basic knowledge. i shouldntve bothered studying</p>
<p>hey bro i also did a all nighter and after taking the ap stat test i feel like Sh#@!
this test was so hard that i am still depressed!!!</p>