<p>it is possible to have a good, bad, or mediocre intellectual experience in an AP class. It is possible to have a good, bad, or mediocre intellectual experience in a non-AP class. It is possible to have a good, bad, or mediocre intellectual experience in a college class. But whatever your feeling about AP classes, I think most of us can agree that high school grades are a function of very different inputs than college grades. Day to day factors in high school courses (homework, attendence, participation, busywork, "sucking up") are a much larger component of grades than they are for college courses. College courses generally say, "here are the lectures, you can attend or not. Here are the assignments, you can do them or not". It is highly likely that the grade will depend entirely on the midterm and final. Is it possible to cram for the exams the night before and pass a college course without learning anything? Absolutely! But it is also possible to spend a lot of time in a high school course on stuff that is totally irrelevant to actually learning the subject.</p>
<p>Many (most?) kids are going to have AP scores and course grades that coincide pretty well, and this discussion is irrelevant to them. There are 2 groups who are likely to have a sharp disparity - the "Conscientious Plugger" of limited intellectual ability, and the "Lazy Smart Kid". Maybe every course should have 2 grades. One grade could be designed to measure effort expended, the other to measure level of knowledge and ability in the subject, however it was gained. Colleges could do with that whatever they wish. </p>
<p>I personally loathed high school, and found it to be a strong anti-learning and anti-intellectual experience (this was the pre-AP era). My sympathy is with the smart kid who can demonstrate mastery of a subject more easily than s/he can play the game that leads to good grades in high school.</p>