<p>Who were ANne Hutchinson and Roger WIlliams?</p>
<p>They were kicked out of Massachusettes for challanging Puritan beliefs. Roger Williams founded Rhode Island, and Anne Hutchinson took refuge there, I believe. Anne Hutchinson challanged that based on the Puritan beliefs, the elect should not have to obey any human laws. This was antinominism...or something. I don't remember exactly. I'm not sure what exactly Roger Williams did- I think he challanged predestination...</p>
<p>Edit: It's antinomianism.</p>
<p>New Question: What was the Potsdam conference and which world leaders were present?</p>
<p>Anne Hutchinson said that you could establish a direct relationship with God and didn't need the church.
Roger Williams also believed in the separation of church and state...and wanted to pay Indians for their land
Yes they went to Rhode Island</p>
<p>booker t washington wanted economic change first and dubois wanted immediate social change
or was it the other way around? no..I think I have it right</p>
<p>wow, dipping into english history. uh, i think it involved getting william of orange and his english wife (...mary+ some number?) to be the monarchs of england and giving more pwr to parliament. it was glorious because it didn't involve any fighting. no idea who they dethroned or why though. james something or other?</p>
<p>what were the differences in the philosophies of booker t washington and web dubois concerning how blacks should further themselves in society?</p>
<p>W.E.B. Dubois said that the "talented 10 percent" of the Black community should have access to all resources, meaning full political, economical, social freedom. </p>
<p>Booker T said that Blacks should try to establish themselves in society, so Whites would respect them. If they could achieve respect in the white community, then they should aim for more freedom. They need to educate themselves first, and he had that essay in the Atlanta Exposition about a bucket and passing it on ..something like that</p>
<p>Answering my own question: The Potsdam Conference divided Berlin into four occupation zones after WWII. Truman, Stalin and Churchill were there.</p>
<p>Actually this has ALOT to do with US History because the Glorious Revolution is what led to salutary neglect. William and Mary (like the college) knew they couldn't control the colonies and didn't really try to. Later when Britain tried to enforce things like the Navigation acts the colonists got ****ed (nicely put) because they were so used to the policy of salutary neglict</p>
<p>Which convention caused the Federalist party to lose a lot of power
Hartford</p>
<p>By "not U.S. History" I was saying that I didn't learn much about that this year, I was recalling it from World History, RATHER than U.S. I know that it did have to do with U.S. History. You misread my answer, silly. :P</p>
<p>Cmon with the Shay's and Bacon's rebellion question...=)</p>
<p>SOrry emmery..>I thought you guys were saying it wasn't US history...cuz anything dealing with Britain during the colonial times is really important to us history =) I misunderstood you</p>