<p>^ I said like what you said. But I said only upper class women could actively oppose their situations, as otheres couldn't afford to buck the trend.</p>
<p>Sorry, Inguyen, but you're wrong. The core of the DBQ is supposed to be the analysis of the documents with outside information added in.</p>
<p>can someone analyze the DBQ document, the cartoon one with like a slave mama being sold off to a white dude and he was carrying like a stick or something and there was another slave lady carrying the child of the lady who was being sold off. Was a sad picture but i didn't quite understand how i was suppose to incorporate that shizzie into the documentizzie.</p>
<p>you can relate that the abolitionist propoganda is part of the abolitionist movement, which inspired women to fight for rights (the suffrage movement)</p>
<p>I said people who bought slaves only wanted the men, because they were seen as more fit for grueling tasks like field work. The women and children were left behind.</p>
<p>only problem i hit was the dbq, which i had to fabricate.</p>
<p>essays overall were not that difficult.</p>
<p>mc, i did well enough to get a 3-4.</p>
<p>i said the men were more appealing to to hard labor</p>
<p>In English we read Uncle Tom's Cabin so it wasn't that women weren't desired really. It was more that families were split up, and if you think about the cult of domesticity, what good is a woman if she can't be a mother? So not only was she to be abused by beating, but also by not being able to fulfill her 'womanhood' by raising her children.</p>
<p>it can go either way</p>
<p>Wow...Form A's FRQ was significantly harder than that of Form B. I thought our's was colossally easier.</p>
<p>=p</p>
<p>For the slave mom, I talked about how one way they protested was through infanticide. Basically I said industrialization, war, and going west all led to changing roles.</p>
<p>the dbq for form b was SO MUCH EASIER...wow i would have destroyed that one if i had had it</p>
<p>the frqs for form b look harder though, so im okay with our test i guess</p>
<p>magicmonkey07 </p>
<p>Well that's not what my teacher said, but ok. I never said the documents should not be analyzed and effectively used in the paper. What I meant was that one should not structure his or her DBQ around the documents, but rather use them to help him or her prove a specific point. On one of the essays my teacher gave us, a girl used only the documents to respond to the question with hardly any outside information; she got a 4 on that essay.</p>
<p><3</p>
<p>wow form b looks so much easier. i think their frq look easier as well. especially number 5 about culture in the '20s. could you get an easier culture question? i'm jealous!</p>
<p>but who knows about mc</p>
<p>can someone post their answers for essay 2 and 4 please?
for 2, i talked about religion and econ development... how the spanish wanted to convert the natives to catholicism and they built missions and sent missionaries to america
and also, it was in their main interest to find gold for the spanish monarchy
for english, the puritans wanted to get away from the church of england, and jamestown --> tobacco, and NE was trade and commerce
for 4, I basically talked about how the new immigrants were coming during that time and it was after WWI, and the old immigrants didn't like them cause they were competition and could not readily assimilate... congress passed that native origins act or something limiting immigration rates
for labor, i talked about labor unions... prob off... but I said like AFL adn whatever fighting for better conditions, etc.
is this right?</p>
<p>for 4, for immigrants i said there was a rise in new immigrants with the opening of ellis island and through the progressive era. then talked about nativism, immigration quotas, and sacco and vanzetti</p>
<p>Lets see...</p>
<h1>3- Freedman's Bureau, KKK/ Force Act, 14th Amendments, Compromise of 1877; morill land grant act, homestead act, transcontinental railroad land grants</h1>
<h1>4- Major business regulation v. Laissez Faire; Muckrakers and settlement houses supporting immigrants v. nativism, KKK, National Origins Act.</h1>
<p>What do you think? I said that the reason the federal government got more involved in westward expansion as a result of the Civil War was overcrowding and the American desire to escape the horrors of war. I kinda BS'ed it.</p>
<p>3) race relations:b/c the dates were 1861-77, i included stuff like emancipation proclamation, 13th 14th and 15th amendments, force acts (to deal with KKK and JimCrow laws)...all show that fed. gov't was taking a more active role in slavery problem. westward expansion: i said this was made possible b/c the slavery issue was becoming resolved (no more disputes, like in texas, kansas, nebraska...) and i talked about like gov't funded land grants for the rail road, transcontinental RR in 1869, homestead act...yep</p>
<p>4) i said that the momentum of progressives was slowed significantly...in regards to business: 3 republican presidents, all of whom favored big business and let it strengthen (then i said this went against TRoosevelt's 3 c's (control of companies), and against wilson's triple wall of priveledge) then there was legislation like hawley smoot tariff (1930, might not apply) that aided big business. imigrants: isolationist principles of the 1920's (because of war) made americans not favor new immigrants, like the imigration quotient laws in 1921/24, and then stuff like the redscare/Palmer Raids....</p>
<p>Same here ustas06</p>