<p>This is a data point of exactly one, but when ds1 applied to Carleton, Grinnell and Mac, Carleton was the best offer of the three. Yes, he received both merit and FA from all three, but the bottom-line figure was best at Carleton by a few thousand.</p>
<p>Ds2 decided not to apply to any of those schools but did apply to Pomona and CMC. Their offers were fabulous and quite similar to Carleton’s for ds1. Now, this year is the one year that we’ll have two in college so Pomona’s and CMC’s offers might have been a little more generous than Carleton’s appeared that first year with ds1, when he was the only one in college, but all the offers – ds1’s first year at Carleton and ds2’s first-year offer at Pomona and CMC – were within a couple of thousand of each other, when taking everything (work study and loans) into account.</p>
<p>When ds2 and I visited Carleton I liked what we were told – that the school is 95% need blind. Basically, they admit 95% of the class and then assess where they are with regards to FA. If they haven’t met their quota, they can admit more who need it. If they’ve overshot it, then that last 5% are admitted in part on their ability to pay. I’m thankful that ds1 apparently was in that first 95%. Is that the way it still goes? I hate for someone to read Carleton isn’t totally “need blind” and have people assume that admissions officers are sitting in rooms twirling their handlebar mustaches trying to figure out how to only admit the richest of the rich, because that’s just not the case in our experience. </p>