<p>@katliamom
Thank you, then I’ll also apply to public schools. How significant is this advantage of not needing financial aid? Can it really make the difference between admission and refusal?</p>
<p>Oh, they are familiar enough with our system? Okay. Then I won’t be disadvantaged when compared to American students even if my grades appear to be lower because of various differences between both educational systems?
Will they take my high school’s national rank (and therefore, competitivity) into account? </p>
<p>Okay. I’m getting some info about Amherst, Williams and other LACs, I’ll definitely apply to some of them, too.
I’ll also apply to Princeton, as it doesn’t consider 9th grade results when reviewing an application (this is a big plus, meaning that only my 10th grade results will look mediocre on the app instead of two consecutive years).</p>
<p>@ChickenLadder
Ah, alright, I didn’t understand. So Amherst, for example, will provide the same bachelor’s degree as, say, Columbia? There’s no difference between both degrees (apart from the school’s name)?</p>
<p>I see. More specifically, are Cam/Oxford well regarded in the tech/tech entrepreneurship sectors? This question’s vague, it doesn’t matter if you can’t answer it.</p>
<p>Yeah, ECs… But I thought it wasn’t about the number?
I mean, schools look at your degree of involvement, right? Not at the NUMBER of activities you’re doing.
If you’re simultaneously playing piano, baseball, basketball, belong to four clubs and lead two other associations, it’s supposed to not make you better (actually, I think it makes you less likely of getting in) than a student which has two or three interests but who pursues them as much as he can.
Isn’t it the case? Am-I completely mistaken?</p>