<p>^ Actually, I think that's rather misleading.</p>
<p>First of all, the reason why the acceptance rate for internationals are lower than other groups at colleges that don't mind funding for them (Harvard, Yale, etc.) is not simply because they are not American. I wager it has a lot more to do with what kind of an education they have had.</p>
<p>For example, most international students have little access to standard US curriculum like AP or honors classes. Even though colleges are no doubt aware of the fact that many international students only have "regular" classes offered to them, it's safer, so to speak, to opt for an identical American who has taken AP classes.</p>
<p>Another thing is mastery of English. Essays, SATs, and even portions of the application can be heavily affected by lack of English understanding. Many international students are from countries whose official language is not English, and unless the students attend English-curriculum schools, they will be mainly emerged in the language of their state.</p>
<p>There's also the cultural barrier. Some cultures find certain topics or ways of expression most Americans find untactful to be not only acceptable but encouraged. Especially in essays, this kind of expression can lead to bad impressions.</p>
<p>I would contend that international students are being rejected at steeper rates than natives because they haven't proved themselves similarly able as US students using the same system. It's not because they are foreigners who, measured on the same scale as US students, are superior but are rejected because they are not US citizens.</p>
<p>The rule, however, is that most US colleges DO care about funding, so it DOES matter if you're not a US citizen even if you are equally distinguished in America.</p>
<p>And about OP's issue... I'd agree that it probably is easier for international Asians to get into colleges than Asians if both were from the US since theoretically Internationals increase diversity more than mere Asians. Ah, AA.</p>