<p>The OP’s original question is impossible to answer: whether the Ivies are “worth all the bother” depends completely on what the student wants from his/her program. His/her preferences, life goals, career goals, financial constraints, and educational goals are all relevant - it’s impossible for this calculus to be the same for any two students.</p>
<p>Much of the reason the Ivies have the reputation they do is because of their students, hence why USNWR is a self-fulfilling prophecy: give a school a better reputation and more ambitious, qualified students will start to fill its seats. </p>
<p>To be honest, I chose Penn purely for its rank, and though it wasn’t a perfect fit, I can honestly say I don’t regret it for a second: I made life-long friends, studied under world-class professors who cared deeply about their students, and learned more about myself than I ever had before. Could I have done this elsewhere? Probably, but what I think Penn offered me was a chance to be surrounded by so many students who were as focused and interested as I was. (Of course, there are students like that everywhere, but having transferred from a two-year stint at USC, I can attest that there are many fewer of them there.) I think what makes the Ivies and other similarly ranked schools special is that earnest, interested students are the norm, not the exception. I suspect LACs are this way as well, but in an even more intimate environment. (The trouble with an LAC, for me, was that few of them have very active music performance programs. Otherwise, I’d have gone in a second if I could have.)</p>
<p>On the other side of the coin: I will be the first to admit that Penn’s music department (where I majored in music) is highly dysfunctional and will not even come close to adequately preparing you for graduate work in musicology or performance. (State flagships are much better in this regard! USC sure was, which is why I’m glad I got so much out of my years there.) Like I said, whether it’s “worth the bother” depends entirely on the major and what you want to get from your college experience. I’ll be the first to admit that I really wanted the Ivy imprimatur. It’s shallow, vain, etc., but it’s something that was important to me, and I’m glad I did it. I’m sure it helped some with graduate admissions and will give me a marginal advantage in job applications, but it’s no golden ticket: you still have to do the work and market yourself to employers. (And remind them that Jerry Sandusky didn’t coach at Penn <em>cough</em>)</p>
<p>Bottom line: Both extremes are wrong: the Ivies aren’t a golden ticket anywhere, and they’re not arbitrarily ranked highly either. An Ivy degree won’t give you anything that isn’t available at other schools, but I don’t think anyone can deny that, generally speaking, the education offered at the Ivies is great. It’s great in large part because the students are, on the whole and in my experience, serious and stimulating people who inspire you to want to learn. (Again, true at some other schools as well.) Whether it’s worth it is too subjective a question to meaningfully answer: it just depends on the student.</p>
<p>@Sally: Your analogy is flawed, as heart surgery is a physical technique much in the same way playing a musical instrument is: is cannot be taught without literal hands-on experience, as you will never acquire muscle memory from verbal instructions alone. That being said, I agree completely with your general sentiment: lecturing is fine, but active engagement is the gold standard. Socrates was right: emphasis on dialectic is key to education, IMHO. (Law schools seem to do that part right, even if classes are far too large…)</p>