<p>Well, here's what I encountered. </p>
<p>On my practice, I got 99 Math, 98 Verbal 92 Reading and as a combined score I placed between 88-92</p>
<p>I find that completely bogus, especially when I look at other people's scores on this forum</p>
<p>Well, here's what I encountered. </p>
<p>On my practice, I got 99 Math, 98 Verbal 92 Reading and as a combined score I placed between 88-92</p>
<p>I find that completely bogus, especially when I look at other people's scores on this forum</p>
<p>based on my experience, the pr scale was much harsher than the actually SSAT scale, but then again, thats just me.</p>
<p>that was my experience too</p>
<p>yeah that’s definitely way harsher than the actual test. on the real thing, i got a 92, 94, and 99 and still got a 98 overall.
if your score was real, it would probably be 99 combined.</p>
<p>Peterson’s isn’t anywhere close to the real thing in Math. In the practice tests I would get all the answers correct, but in the actual test I got a low percentile compared to my ohter scores.</p>
<p>PR’s lower level scores are waaaay off, they’re too generous (the actual test= much harder). no idea with the upper level.</p>
<p>actual test=much easier. On my own prac test I failed, real deal i did more than fine.</p>
<p>PR’s practice tests were pretty similar to the real deal, i found, but kaplans tests were too easy.</p>