<p>hello everyone! just thought i’d pop in and share my thoughts on art portfolios for admissions to all types of schools. i’m heading off to college this fall and probably will study art in some form or another, so here goes.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>the portfolio to the art school: i was accepted at risd, so i hope that legitimizes my advice. these schools are looking for all types and styles. your main work can be as un-observational and un-realistic and messy and whatever as you want. an EXTREMELY good way to get a sense of the accepted students’ work is to join the facebook groups for the admitted classes, and there are tons of photos of the work they submitted. while acceptance rates can be 20% - 50%, it’s really much more selective, as only students who have interest and talent are applying. warning: the applicant pool is highly self-selective and filled with superstars, and art itself is so subjective, so it can seem like a crapshoot. however, sharp technical skill is essentially quantitative and is a solid boost to your portfolio, as goes for great observational drawings. but do not feel the need to stuff your portfolio with these, as the home tests usually allow for good room for observational and technical things (think RISD bike and 3 perspective drawings).</p></li>
<li><p>the portfolio to the small schools (i.e. small LACs): from my experience, applying and being accepted to tiny schools like swarthmore, pomona, etc., your portfolio is almost always considered if you’re a decent applicant. these schools have smaller applicant pools than big universities, and they still need to diversify their class, meaning they’re looking and will seek after people interested in and talented in the arts. many small LACs come with forms that you send in with your art portfolio that are actually the rating forms, so you can see how they grade it (usually on a number scale with optional comments). generally, if you submit a great portfolio (remember, technically proficient and observational drawings are key) then you’ll get some kind of boost, but if you really stand out the LAC could send you a likely letter or something. always, always, submit a portfolio to these schools–it usually helps.</p></li>
<li><p>the portfolio to ivies, stanford, mit, etc.: submitting portfolios to these schools seem to be the next big hype, but as someone accepted to ivies including yale and harvard with them noting positive things on my portfolio, i hope i can offer some valid advice. these schools review only a small portion of the art supplements simply because there are too many. there is a way, though, to almost guarantee that your portfolio is reviewed: convince them that you’re interested in art. you also must be academically decent (i’d say there probably is no “cutoff” to review supplements, but try to get your SAT over 2000 and GPA over 3.5). whether that be writing an essay, your teachers mentioning your passion, having years of workshops and lessons, you must first and foremost demonstrate an interest for them to go out of their way to review your supplement. do note that most of them reviewed are deemed as average, and sending in something average could potentially be detrimental, as most of these schools specifically tell you that they are looking for exceptional talent. from personal experience and seeing many successful applicants who submitted portfolios, they all had mega technical skill, observational drawings, and a solid body of work (10-15 pieces). i’m talking about very lifelike and accurate portraits, advanced still lifes, diversity in media, etc. i think the most important factor here is to have a very solid technical background and being able to acutely transfer what you see to paper. reconsider sending in a portfolio if you’re just doing it for the sake of having a supplement.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>ultimately, overall, if you’re interested in art, you don’t always have to have a killer portfolio. sometimes the most talented kids don’t do anything with their talent, so if your portfolio isn’t great but you still love it–then show it. do something in your community with art, teach lessons, start a club. those actions will ultimately do more for a university than the university having the next van gogh huddled up in a clammy studio all day; i know of plenty of talented artists, actors, design kids, film kids, who didn’t even submit portfolios and were accepted to the most competitive schools. </p>
<p>feel free to PM me (i must admit many people on this forum helped me with my art supplements, so i’d like to re-pay the favor) with anything: suggestions on portfolios, questions, etc. i’m glad to help.</p>