Article: Business is the most popular major but that doesn't mean it's a good choice.

@prof2dad - My personal experience is that you are correct. Remember the family member with a 2.9X I talked about earlier? She could only get into law schools of the lowest tier, but no problem getting into the best MBA programs in Canada. I think they are fully aware of the grading practice at Rotman.

There are research out there that suggest otherwise, however. Since the article is behind a paywall, here are two excerpts:

“Experts take high performance as evidence of high ability” but don’t consider how easy it is to achieve that performance, wrote researchers from University of California, Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, polling firm CivicScience Inc. and Harvard Business School. The research was published last week in the journal PLOS ONE”.

“In one experiment, 23 admissions officers evaluated nine fictional business-school applicants from schools identified as being of similar quality but with different grading standards. Even after acknowledging that other students worked harder to earn their high marks, the reviewers still admitted students with inflated grades at a higher rate.

Admissions officers do this despite claiming that their years of experience reviewing applications given them a good sense of which schools tend to churn out A students and which actually give average students a middle C.

Another study considered more than 30,000 recent applicants to elite business schools, and again found that those from more lenient undergraduate institutions—determined by measuring average GPAs at those schools—had a better shot at”.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323997004578640241102477584

This type of cognitive bias is well known in social psychology.If true, I really feel sorry for Canadian students.

UIUC requires entering freshmen to apply and be accepted directly into a college. The following lists the admissions statistics for each college. Of the 10 colleges at UIUC, the College of Business had the second highest admissions statistics only behind the College of Engineering. If COB graduates are “dim bulbs”, the rest of the school must be “burnt out” bulbs.

College of Agricultural, Consumer, & Environmental Sciences
ACT Score: 25-29
SAT Score (no writing): 1240-1400
TOEFL: 98-107
GPA: 3.22-3.79

College of Applied Health Sciences
ACT Score: 25-30
SAT Score (no writing): 1220-1400
TOEFL: 101-110
GPA: 3.32-3.76

College of Business
ACT Score: 28-32
SAT Score (no writing): 1320-1460
TOEFL: 103-110
GPA: 3.50-3.88

College of Education
ACT Score: 24-29
SAT Score (no writing): 1250-1400
TOEFL: 101-110
GPA: 3.20-3.68

College of Engineering
ACT Score: 31-34
SAT Score (no writing): 1400-1530
TOEFL: 106-113
GPA: 3.68-4.00

College of Fine + Applied Arts
ACT Score: 25-30
SAT Score (no writing): 1220-1380
TOEFL: 96-107
GPA: 3.05-3.67

College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
ACT Score: 27-32
SAT Score (no writing): 1350-1470
TOEFL: 103-110
GPA: 3.35-3.86

College of Media
ACT Score: 26-30
SAT Score (no writing): 1210-1390
TOEFL: 101-109
GPA: 3.14-3.68

Division of General Studies
ACT Score: 25-30
SAT Score (no writing): 1320-1420
TOEFL: 100-107
GPA: 3.10-3.65

School of Social Work
ACT Score: 23-27
SAT Score (no writing): Sample size too small to report
TOEFL: 99-105
GPA: 3.08-3.61

@cobrat

One would think the LAC grad who is “disturbed” by the writing skills of college of business grads would know better than to take anecdotal data and try to extrapolate it and think it is reliable. Anecdotal data is just that. A small sample.

The COB grads I know can’t write well, therefore, all college of business grads do not write well. Had you just shared your first hand experiences that would have been fine, I might have disagreed with you based on my first hand experiences, and we both would have had a point. But, besides writing, COB grads learn some practical real world skills that are useful for running real business that hire real people that pay real taxes so they don’t have time to sit around all day and theorize about what budgets or tax compliance is in an abstract way or write 45 page gobbly-gook papers about any topic they can do functional things that generate revenues which why they will get hired.

Regarding what you, and a few others that seem to be a bit hard to find now, posted about how hard a degree from the COB is, you are wrong, but carry on it doesn’t matter to me what you think about that. Go ahead and theorize all day about absolutely nothing and post links back and forth in a completely pointless way. The government is full of people with fancy degrees from expensive schools and look how well the government functions and handles resources. Great at theory, not so hot in practice.

But, that isn’t why I can back to this thread.

I actually came back to kind of agree with @cobrat in one sense and it is based on anecdotal information of all things. The dean of the COB at the major research university in my city made some big changes to admissions to that college a few years ago. In short, what he did was require all students entering the COB to take 5 foundation level classes and get a certain GPA in those five foundation classes to stay in the COB. I think he also laid off/fired/furloughed some of the lower level none PhD faculty also. He blogged about it and so forth and I heard about it because I teach at a community college that feeds that university.

What he wanted was quality and not quantity.

He determined that there were too many COB grads in relation to the number of quality jobs available for COB grads so he did something about it. Before the changes, cobrat you were kind of right, some of the COB grads from this school were not exactly proficient in communication skills. It turns out, just about anybody in higher education, across all disciplines, bemoans that same thing. We all see it and we all wonder when the world will end because of it.

What is somewhat remarkable about what the dean did was that he did it at a public university. Usually, public U’s do not limit programs in that way unless there is a clear need to do so. Usually, in my experience, public U’s will bring them in and churn them out without any regard to the job market. In turns out, that is your problem not theirs.

My advice to parents with children considering a COB degree is due your due diligence. Check it out. If the programs are responsive to the needs of the workforce and updated and sound real and legit your child will get an excellent education if he or she does his or her part. The COB dean I am speaking of made the changes because employers were complaining about that school’s COB grads. The curriculum changed to better meet the needs of the ER’s and that is what you are looking for in any college program IMHO. By the way, there is something else of interest here to parents and students that I’d like to share.

From what I’ve heard, through the grapevine, the major research U’s COB added some sort of business administration degree for the folks who do pursue a “technical” field like finance or accounting from the COB. The word on the street is it is a “baby” degree. I’m not 100% sure what that means but what I heard was it is a watered down degree for the people who couldn’t hack a real COB degree. In other words, be careful what you sign up for.

The usual college prep math sequence in US high schools reaches precalculus in 12th grade. More advanced students take calculus in high school. This matches the expectation that college frosh should be ready for calculus. That many fail to meet that is a result of many high schools being low quality or the students not being committed to retaining material learned.

But the point is, calculus is not some extremely advanced course like real analysis or historiography.

@ucbalumnus

Actually, historiography would be an intermediate-level course at best and sometimes considered a more advanced introductory course at some colleges/universities.

However, it may not always be given as a specific historiography course per se. Instead, one would learn historiography in the course of taking an intermediate or even advanced introductory history course on a given subfield…whether by geographic region and time period or a specific theme(i.e. Specific wars or social movements).

And while non-STEM folks or even many business folks(including some accounting majors I know of) don’t need calculus per se, taking it is one good way of exercising and honing one’s intellect.

Also, if one hopes to pursue K-12 teaching, it’s good to have demonstrated some advanced math skills even if one’s focus is on social science/humanities fields.

Several teacher friends who focused on such fields ended up being pressed into service as math/STEM teachers despite their lack of major because of the severe shortage of STEM teachers in their school districts. Fortunately, all completed math up to/beyond calculus.

  • As opposed to career considerations.

@GoNoles85

I was citing numerous accounts from the senior supervisors and HR folks from an earlier position in a medium-sized financial firm in the Boston area.

And as in my post, they made an exception for those who attended the elite undergrad b-schools like Wharton, NYU-Stern, Berkeley-HAAS, UMich-Ross, UVA-McIntire, etc.

However, their experiences with undergrad b-school graduates from colleges below that elite tier was so troublesome in the area of basic written communication AND math(really arithmetic level) skills* that they felt it wasn’t worth the risk to continue hiring undergrad b-school majors below the elite tier. Especially considering some of the mistakes could result in serious fines and even possible jail time for the supervisors responsible for the employees whose errors attract the negative attention of the SEC.

Am I following? Unless you attend Haas or Wharton, you may graduate unable to read and write or complete basic arithmetic? We may have crossed into hyperbole here.

@cobrat,

It’s thrilling to know that business school grads of at least 5 universities can handle basic written communication skills and arithmetic level math. After all the money we spend on K-12 and then all the money that goes down the drain after that you’d think you wouldn’t need an elite, competitive school for those skills.

By the way, I can’t help picturing you doing an impression of Thurston Howell III, from Gilligan’s Island, when you explain how tough it must’ve been to even try to explain basic communication and math skills to these pathetic, helpless b-school grads not from the upper crust. They must’ve been practically savages. Cavemen. How did they get through all those levels of school without knowing how to compose a paragraph on topic and then make a transition to a supporting point? How could they get through all that education without making arithmetic mistakes serious enough to imperil the very livelihood of the firms they worked for?

It’s appalling. Their parents should have never let them have cell phones or TV’s they should have been studying and doing multiplication tables instead (or using computers since in most post-1950 offices software crunches some of the numbers but that is besides the point these morons would have probably unplugged the computers while slobbering all over themselves). Well, thank you so much for the warning. You tried. You tried to reach them. But nothing could be done to help them.

It is all individual. Some of the folks I work with are terrible. Some write very well. You get better with practice.

I find the higher up they go, they tend to lose the skill as other people write everything for them!! Lol.

But it really has nothing to do with what school you attend. It is a skill that must be constantly practiced. If your job doesn’t require it, you may never develop it, unfortunately. It doesn’t mean you aren’t intelligent, just not practiced.

^it does relate to the school you attend. If you have to write a 5-page paper with one peer edit for your freshman seminar vs. a 20-page paper with multiple revisions vs. nothing, and this for eight semesters, it makes a difference. Some colleges with large class sizes require zero essays or papers - all evaluation is multiple choice. Some colleges couldn’t imagine having a course that doesn’t require a paper (or another form of structured, extended writing). There are skills to learn then a need for practice. Students who only take a Freshman English class and never have to write a paper aren’t likely to have the needed skills nor the practice. :frowning:
Of course, someone who learned and never practiced will lose that skill.

Honestly, most kids come out college not able. It takes years to develop and hone that skill. Even if it was not required in school, they can still do it later.

Plus, many kids who did learn come out with far too literary a style for business anyway IMO.

^Some colleges have a required “writing for your field” class. Many colleges have writing accross the curriculum, where the students hone their writing skills in many classes thus in many genres. A good economics paper shouldn’t be literary, for instance.

I am willing to take it as a given that business college grads, on average, are not as accomplished at writing as grads of programs where writing is a core requirement and the majority of their work output. But I deal with two groups every day where writing is not core, engineers and business people. Some of the engineering communication is downright embarrassing. Much of it is complete off-topic rambling. Business people rarely miss the point.

I agree with @HRSMom . Writing is a skill that needs to be practiced and if one does not practice, then the skill lessens. I am in favor of writing classes being targeted towards the major. It is a different skill to write a technical paper for peer review, or an application for a government grant, or a tax protest, or a legal brief to file a suit with a court, or a news story. All of these different papers require a different skill.

I was a business major a long time ago from a flagship University. I did NOT learn how to write properly in college. Yes, the accounting and finance courses taught me stuff, but if I had to do it all over again, I would ensure that my electives were filled with writing courses. Also, imho, many of the business courses are filled with what I believed to be useless courses in statistics, management, etc. My daughters are both in college and are majoring in Communications with my blessing. I know those are considered worthless majors by many… but I believe the ability to write clearly can open up lots of doors. I did eventually learn to write passably, but it took three years of law school and writing endless legal briefs to get there.

I found stats to be one of the more useful and interesting classes in college and very applicable to both work and life. Most people have no understanding of stats and their easy manipulation.

I too found my management classes wanting. I always felt it was odd where they would present these case studies of companies and ask up to come up with a plan on how we would change things. It put you into the seat of the CEO/owner/president. It just seemed a bit much for a first or second year business student to be acting in such a high capacity. The vast majority of business students will never find themselves in that position to make the decisions contemplated by those case studies.

I like it better when case studies are like: you must organize a company event… an executives’ retreat… for an event planning company. You must reorganize the office. You must choose 2 candidates among 5 who will go on to interviews with your boss. You must design a campaign for a failed product.

Basic skills, like writing and basic math, should be taught and learned, way before someone is college age. The three “R’s” reading, writing and arithmetic. None of these Ivy and elite school superstars that Cobrat cites learned how to write in college. It happened well before that. We shouldn’t give those great schools credit for that skill.

@GoNoles85

First, if that was sufficient, why is it that most colleges…including Ivy/peer elite colleges mandate writing/expository writing courses for all students unless they can satisfactorily prove their writing skills meet/exceed the standards of those who completed the course?

Likewise for those regarding the quantitative proficiency requirements(Many respectable/elite colleges I know of do offer remedial math courses below calc/precalc, but won’t count them as credit towards graduation).

And I’ll repeat a quote from a post I made(post #8):