as Research Uni (UCLA+CAL+SD+SB) vs HYPS

<p>290 (UCLA+UCB+UCSD+UCSB) >>> 259(HYPS)</p>

<p>UC Breakdown(wild guess)</p>

<p>UCLA 90
UCB 85
UCSD 75
UCSB 40</p>

<p>UCI 25
UCD 25
UCR 10
UCSC 5
UCSF 84</p>

<p>Stanford 85
Harvard(less than 58)
Yale(less than 58)
Princeton(less than (58) </p>

<p>According to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. For 2003, Caltech was awarded 139 patents, which was slightly ahead of MIT's 127 patents but behind the University of California System with its 439 patents.
"What the ranking does not show is the fact that nearly two-thirds of these patents have been licensed to companies trying to develop new The ranking is welcome news to Rich Wolf, who is Caltech's director of technology transfer. "This ranking further demonstrates the commitment on the part of the Institute to commercialize the science and technology developed in the course of basic research. </p>

<p>technology products to benefit the public sector," Wolf added. "A significant number of these patents have been licensed to start-up companies that have provided jobs and boosted the local economy. </p>

<p>According to the patent office, the University of Texas System was fourth on the 2003 list, with 96 patents, followed by Stanford University with 85. Others in the top 10 were the University of Wisconsin System (84), Johns Hopkins University (70), the University of Michigan (63), Columbia University (61), Cornell University (59), and the University of Florida (59).</p>

<p>Total Research amount(2003)</p>

<p>LA+B+SD+SB
Total</p>

<p>$2,152,183,000</p>

<p>UCLA 849,359,000
UCB 507,186,000
UCSD 646,508,000
UCSB 149,130,000</p>

<p>HYPS</p>

<p>Total</p>

<p>$1,579,529,000</p>

<p>Harvard 408,707,000
Yale 387,644,000
Princeton 179,951,000
Stanford 603,227,000</p>

<p>what's the point of all of these posts...?</p>

<br>


<br>

<p>Drop your inferiority complex.</p>

<p>UC are underrated while HYP are way overrated.</p>

<p>Off the topic</p>

<p>List of Top 10 Organizations Receiving Most U.S. Patents</p>

<p><a href="http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/06-03.htm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/speeches/06-03.htm&lt;/a> </p>

<p>1 2,941 IBM (USA) </p>

<p>2 1,828 Canon (Japan) </p>

<p>3 1,797 HP (USA) </p>

<p>4 1,688 Panasonic (Japan) </p>

<p>5 1,641 Samsung (Korea) </p>

<p>6 1,561 Micron (Taiwan) </p>

<p>7 1,549 Intel (USA)</p>

<p>8 1,271 Hitachi (Japan) </p>

<p>9 1,258 Toshiba (Japan) </p>

<p>10 1,154 Fujitsu (Japan)</p>

<p>Dude, what are you doing? Your addressing me on a thread that I didn't post on. How ridiculous. </p>

<p>I have no inferiority complex. I do realize the Ivy League attracts many strong students. Are you unable to deal with that? You have the inferiority complex. You also make up statistics. Get real ones. UCs may be underrated and Ivies overrated, but that doesn't mean that they're of poor quality, that the students that go there are poor, ect. Get over yourself and the UC system. It's amazing, but it's not the hands down best.</p>

<br>


<br>

<p>True. But since I went to one of them(S), I might know better than you.</p>

<p>I am going to one of them, too, and I don't claim to be the expert on anything.</p>

<p>I thought CotoDeCasa went to Stanford... :rolleyes:</p>

<p>Yes, I did. </p>

<br>


<br>

<p>Then I went to MIT for GS.</p>

<p>it'll be a busy day for UCLA.</p>