<p>Now that I've gotten the ranting out of my system venting to friends...</p>
<p>
[quote]
I didn't mean to offend, jessiehl, just to express a bit of dismay at your seemingly cynical reply in this thread.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>No worries, and you're right, it <em>was</em> cynical. :)</p>
<p>
[quote]
And if I can take a guess (could be wrong), I would suspect that you are of the opinion that many people take a diagnosis as an excuse to explain away otherwise modifyable behavior.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>It does happen (I've known of cases where parents refuse to discipline their children pretty much at all on the grounds that they are autistic and can't help it...they aren't doing those kids, autistic or not, any favors), but it's not quite what I meant (and it's an argument I am careful about, because it tends to get used to bash mentally ill people, including some of my dear friends).</p>
<p>My problems are more with the implications of lumping more and more people under the same umbrella. I feel that it's trivialized the problems of some <em>very</em> disordered people in public perception, e.g "I know someone on the spectrum, and he graduated from college and lives on his own and has a white-collar job, so how much of a problem can it be?" Perhaps even more, I think it does harm to cure efforts, from a political perspective, because a lot of mild Aspies are saying, understandably, that they are just different, not disordered, and see cure-related research as an attempt to wipe them out. Well, I understand why they feel threatened, but when I was growing up we knew families where the autistic kids had to be kept in muzzles or straitjackets to stop them from tearing themselves apart.</p>
<p>I have a knee-jerk reaction to the phrase "on the spectrum" because it makes things into a false binary (similar to the false binary that the "spectrum" phrase was supposed to get out of people's heads) - "on the spectrum" vs. "neurotypical". There is no binary. There is a spectrum, and <em>everyone</em> is on it, and the question is where you need to be on it in order to be considered disordered. I feel like that point has been shifting to include more and more of the population, possibly in response to the fact that getting a diagnosis of <em>something</em> is often the only way in our system to ensure that a kid's individual needs are considered (which I also have a problem with). Hence my cynicism about it.</p>
<p>And now I have seriously thread-jacked. Back on topic. OP, IQ tests usually measure different areas of intelligence - sub-intelligences, if you will - in addition to giving you an overall number. Do you know if your daughter's IQ tests show any particular areas of strength? A known area of strength could translate into training potential for a particular vocation, or possibly even a particular college major at a college with good disability services.</p>