B.S. Biology or B.S. Environmental sciences

<p>I know how Biology is looked down upon these threads, but with all of that aside, which of the two is better? A B.S. in Biology or a B.S. in Environmental science? I'm looking to become a field ecologist focusing on conservation of plant species of different environments(deserts, tundras, tropical, temperate,etc.). I'd like to mix both lab work and field work. So some jobs, I'd like to do would be to work in a zoo, aquarium, botanical garden, the field, etc. The B.S. in biology would offer me courses in field ecology, plant as well as animal courses, as well as the cognate courses. A degree in environmental sciences focuses more on the physical aspect of the earth(hydrgeology, mineralogy,etc) and policy, but less on the biological side of the environment. I don't know, but it seems that Bio would be a better choice, but I just wanted some aspects.</p>

<p>I think you pretty much answered your own question. A biology major (or, ecology/evolution or conservation biology) is more consistent with your stated interests. You can always take some electives in environmental science, when those courses touch on your broader interests in ecology.</p>

<p>It is not that biology is looked down upon. I think the study of life is fascinating. I just think it is better to express your interest by watching the discovery channel when you aren’t working at your high-paying finance job rather than paying $20k+ for a degree that will get you a job collecting carts at Walmart.</p>