Barrons or PR for SAT2 Chemistry?

Test Preparation SAT Subject Test Preparation
1

<p>Barrons or Princeton Review for SAT2 Chemistry? Which one is better?</p>

2

<p>barrons practice tests were disappointing but pr tests were good.
the pr ap chem book is super good for reviewing</p>

3

<p>Pr..................</p>

4

<p>PR.</p>

<p>Please use the search function, there have been literally tens or maybe hundreds of threads answering a simple question like this.</p>

5

<p>Well, the thing is, other threads say Barrons...and barrons is usually harder than the real test so bleh...</p>

6

<p>PR Chem is too easy.</p>

7

<p>PR Chem is accurate (that is, close to the real test). I know for a fact that most will agree.</p>

8

<p>Baaah crud. I would rather have the real test easier than the practice ones in the Barrons, get what I mean?..</p>

9

<p>do both barons and PR , thats what i did</p>

10

<p>Barrons .</p>

11

<p>How's kaplans?</p>

12

<p>McGraw Hill, period. I breezed through the May test.</p>

13

<p>I'm using REA, McGraw, Barrons, Kaplan, and PR right now. I must say McGraw is pretty good. REA, the review was too short and Practice tests looked a little iffy...I liked Barrons set-up. I'll be using PR for a few days and then Kaplan.</p>

14

<p>I juss took SAT Chem in May.</p>

<p>Barrons was not at all helpful.</p>

<p>Princeton Review is the best book out there for SAT Chem review...its easy...understandable and thorough.</p>

<p>Kaplan review is very very comprehensive...infact it helped me for AP Chem!!! the tests are good but the logic in kaplan isn't useful for SAT.</p>

15

<p>PR is too easy and concise</p>

16

<p>Doesn't seem like there's much of a consensus, but Barron's worked for me. I reviewed it and my class notes a few days before the test and wound up doing very well. If you can, maybe try to get to a bookstore and flip through a couple different ones, see which one explains things in a way you like, etc.</p>