<p>Hey guys, I just took the Barrons SAT II math level 2 and I was kind of freaking out because I scored a 690 on it and I'm usually good at math. Any suggestions? I know that Barron tends to overprep you, but still, a 690 on any prep book no matter how hard it could be isn't a good sign for a person hoping to achieve a perfect score. Thanks</p>
<p>Yeah im getting dominated by it too, but my score is a lot worse. kids at my school said they got like 680s on the barrons but got like 750+ the real thing.</p>
<p>Wow, dude. A 690 on Barron's is a really good score.</p>
<p>Take a practice test from PR. I'll be really surprised if you get much less than an 800.</p>
<p>At this point, stop practicing with barron's, use some easier/more realistic test material to build up your confidence and give you a real feel for the test.</p>
<p>You'll do great.</p>
<p>Thanks guys, I guess the PR book would yield a more realistic score. I don't know why barron overpreps, but I kind of like it because if you could ace it, then you can for sure ace the real thing.</p>
<p>2nd what unleashedfury said. I get like 650s on the barrons practice test but on the collegeboard practice problems, I got all out of 20 except like 2.</p>
<p>I just took another Barron's practice test and I got a 710. So I guess I am pretty good shape with the SAT II math; however, I managed to get a lot wrong on the practice problems from the collegboard practice problems. Does that mean that I'm actually better at solving barron problems than the real thing? It would suck if I got a lower score than the barrons.</p>
<p>the thing is, i got about 740 on barrons from my latest practice test, but omitted about 6 and got 5 wrong..</p>
<p>that doesn't seem plausible.. is it? my raw score was 38...</p>
<p>I also feel the same way.
When I do Kaplan’s McGraw-Hills and PR test I get 800s but in the Barron’s one I get 740…
According to my friends that already took the test Barron’s is much harder than the real one.</p>
<p>I never got more than 700 on Barron’s Math II tests. But on the real test, I got 800. So don’t worry. :]</p>
<p>If Im getting 650’s (or mid 600s. Anywhere from 640-670) on practice tests in the Barrons book, do you think I could get a 720 on the real test? Or should I keep on studying some more??</p>
<p>DEFINITELY 720. no need to worry. i was in the same range and got a 760 last year.</p>
<p>I’ve been scoring around 780 on the barrons, you guys think I’m good?</p>
<p>Are you serious? You guys are really crying over like mid to low 700s on BARRON’S?</p>
<p>I just took a practice test, and basically gave up after #31, with like 8ish wrong and with like 5 days until the test. </p>
<p>Then again, only in CC does such a world exist…</p>
<p>Closest I’ve got on Barron’s at the moment is 780.</p>
<p>Can’t someone post the link to the correct barrons book for math 2 from amazon? There’s like several versions. </p>
<p>Sent from my Desire HD using CC</p>
<p>Hey! I just bought both Barrons and Princeton Review Math IIC. I am kind of freak out because math I have been doing is in my Precalculus class. Should I go over whole prep book or just take practice tests and what? I know majority of stuff mentioned in SAT Math IIC curriculum but I am kind of frak out! What kind of strategy should I implant?</p>
<p>i have been studying for math for like a week now. i just took a practice test from barrons and i got a 720. do you think i could get an 800 with that? i really need this 800 because i really messed up all my other subject tests.</p>
<p>I maxes at 640 on Barrons and got a 770 on the real thing.</p>
<p>oh ok. thanks. im just stressed. this 800 means a lot. i guess if thats the case then there is hope!</p>
<p>I found the scores on sparknotes to be more accurate, usually within 30 of what I actually got.</p>