<p>yeah and i’ve actually studied at both the schools in question; what are you up to? barely making the top 10% of your underfunded, destitute california public hs? then probably going on to get an 1150 SAT and still be admitted to berkeley?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Well then we can agree to disagree.</p>
<p>But even then, as has been pointed out, the student:faculty ratio isn’t nearly as telling as class sizes and subsections. That’s what really matters in this area.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>For one, I think that that was more for religious diversity than racial. More importantly, that’s just one group; the majority of white students don’t adhere very much to their cultures as do Asian students. So Jews are one group that one might consider to be rather distinguished (though still more religiously); but Asians? That includes tons of countries, all very, very distinct, and Asians tend to retain their cultures much more.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You really aren’t representing your school very well at all…</p>
<p>Yup, fork in this thread.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>This coming from a guy who said USC > UC Berkeley… L o L …</p>
<p>Yeah right!</p>
<p>So, what’s next after that, elsijfdl? Maybe the University of San Francisco > UC Berkeley??? L o L …<br>
You really are quite an amusing guy. L o L … Sorry, I can’t stop laughing at you and your “flawless” logic. Anyways, Nobody here believes you anymore. So, who cares what you say next.</p>
<p>North is the best yeah woo yeah</p>
<p>Let this thread die please.</p>