<p>You could argue Schell is a dilettante (sp?), but if so, he's one of the most fascinating. I prefer to think of him as a polymath who has chosen a different route than just staying in academia.  He has written many books on China, many of which are well respected, and he can wax eloquent about all varieties of subjects.</p>
<p>But what has he done for the school?</p>
<p>He has clearly re-established its pre-eminence. I don't know what it was like before, but now it is considered a dynamic center.  I don't think it had that profile before, but was just considered the good J-school on the West Coast.</p>
<p>I understand that he got leave to aggressively recruit students who were considering other programs (meaning dollars), so the quality of your fellow students has gone up.</p>
<p>He has hired some first-rate profs.  Michael Pollan, for instance, who has written extensively about food, plants, etc. and is considered a thought leader and a really interesting person. He writes for the NYT as well.</p>
<p>I think Michael Lewis was based there for awhile, if not still. Author of Moneyball, Liar's Poker.</p>
<p>Others I can't think of.</p>
<p>He has helped spearhead some really interesting international journalism projects from a wonderful series co-produced by Salon.com on the visible effects of global warming on every continent.  Or some interesting stories on the economy and pop culture of contemp. China that were published I think by the SF Chronicle.</p>
<p>On the Berkeley campus, he has helped enhance the general discourse by being the sort of Charlie Rose in residence, inviting and interviewing luminaries in all walks of intelligentsia.</p>
<p>I would say, based on my impressions only, that Schell has tried to have students stretch beyond the basic mechanics of writing for newspapers to considering the quality of thought in their pieces.  Also, he seems interested in non-daily-journalism media or writing, and I get the impression that such a broad view of journalism informs his program.</p>
<p>I think in other word's I am re-stating perhaps less eloquently what PNDP said about interdisciplinary focus.  </p>
<p>Additionally, I would say that PNDP is absolutely right when she says that I think it is necessary to develop a thematic focus or foci outside of the narrow mechanics of journalism.  I have friends who have hit the biggest time possible in journalism, at least in their age group.  And all them had a focus that was beyond just wanting to be a journalist. "I want to write about China and its growth." "I want to be a journalist in Asia covering countries there for a US publication." "I want to work for a major NYC-based magazine covering top corporate stories."  For example.  And these are real examples of friends who write for top rags on the level of Fortune, WSJ, and Forbes, respectively. And one is a published author of a reasonably authoritative book on a subject of faddish interest within the corporate and political worlds.</p>
<p>I realize that this is impressionistic.</p>