<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>Some [eople apply Early Decision because they have truly finalized their number 1 choice while others see that the college has a higher acceptance rate during the early process. I have several questions now about the true ED process:</p>
<p>1.) ED typically accepts most of the qualified hooked people.
- most of their atheletes, world class talented people, legacies, and URM. This comprises people who demonstrate significant hooks while also having the strong academic background. </p>
<p>2.) For those people who do not fall in the above category...such as myself... when I apply ED, (In my case, I am applying for the sole reason of wanting to go to the school and having done research to backup my reasons) to a top 14 school (USNEWS rankings)... how am I benefited against the other qualified un-hooked people?</p>
<p>3.) Thus, do ED applicants without hooks typically have better SAT scores than RD un-hooked people or is it about the same? Also, are their GPAs slightly higher or lower? People have provided me both sides, but I would like to know how it is really works in the process.</p>
<p>4.) When colleges provide their ED profile...do top D1 schools like Duke or Stanford exclude thier athletes in their statistics? I mean I am sure they will accept several sub-standard athletes. I would assume that it could bring down their statistics. Thus, I am curious about how competitive ED is?</p>
<p>5.) Just out of example... if a school like Duke, Penn...not HYPS....say that they have a 30% ED acceptance rate, in your opinion..after acccepting all the hooked people, what do you think is the definitive acceptance rate for non-hooked poeple?</p>
<p>Thanks guys. I just wanted to try to expand my scope into the ED process and I hope you can provide some valuable info.</p>