<p>I know for Math IIC it's Barron's and for Chem it's PR but what book for physics? Barrons or PR?</p>
<p>As a Barron's user I wouldn't recommend it at all.
There's just so much superfluous information that you don't need, like AM/FM frequencies and such. I haven't tried the PR but I hear that it's very appropriate; Kaplan I found to be too dumbed-down. If anyone was thinking of taking Peterson's online practice tests I would strongly discourage as well.</p>
<p>And try the Sparknotes physics tests; they're surprisingly accurate. I think there was a promotion of $9.99 for all subject test practice tests...</p>
<p>Okay, so Barrons for Math, PR for Chem&Physics and I'm good to go right? Or is the Barrons for Math IIC superfluous as well?</p>
<p>go with PR for Math II</p>
<p>I got PR for Physics and so far it's looking pretty good.</p>
<p>Use PR for Phys and Math 2C. Got me results.</p>
<p>Honestly, I wouldn't recommend Barrons for Math 2C at all. It's WAY harder than the actual test and has a lot of unnecessary information. I personally used Sparknotes for Math 2C, PR for Physics, and Sparknotes for Chem and got 800, 770, and 800 respectively. I also recommend taking tests from the CollegeBoard official SAT Subject Tests Book. Those are the most accurate practice tests by far. Hope this helps!</p>
<p>don't use Barrons for math</p>
<p>i used it and it made me cry
b/c it had so many superflous stuff that i was horrified that i had to know all that
i memorized stupid formulas and take practice tests which i did horrible on</p>
<p>but the real test was super easier
didnt need any dumb formulas i memorized :(
and i felt like barron wasted my time</p>