<p>some other thoughts–after being on the boards of several greater Boston day schools (grammar not hs–but which sent graduates to these schools), a boarding school, having a practice that is mostly hs and college aged students and having three kids who have looked at greater Boston day schools–but not affiliated with any directly:</p>
<p>RL-- It is NOT what it was now that Fr Jarvis has retired. It is looking for its way forward but hasn’t found it yet. Its huge draw with Harvard admissions is no more (look at last several year’s acceptance list). It has very inflexible set of academic requirements. However, its tuition is astonishingly low because of its endowment. </p>
<p>Winsor–very very large issue with body image with many of the girls here. The present headmistress came on board with a mission to lighten up Winsor–so far hasn’t succeed. Excellent academics, large sport program. One very prominent Boston educational consulting firm is now refusing to recommend Winsor until the culture does indeed change.</p>
<p>BH–always in RL’s shadow but shouldn’t be. Top flight boys school in all respects–also with inflexible requirements, but with an administration that knows where it wants to take the school. A bit difficult to get to in terms of major roads (as compared to several of the other schools) but excellent.</p>
<p>Nobles–for years it has been the toughest admit in Boston day schools. Haughty, but deservedly so. The campus is extraordinary for a day school (very small boarding) No sports waivers, Excellent academics. Great teachers. Lots and lots of homework. Dedham is also off the beaten track a bit. </p>
<p>BBN–For the life of me I can’t understand why this school exists now that Cambridge has a new public high school. For all intents and purposes it is a public high school that would exist in a town such as Weston–but because it is in Cambridge it is a private school. </p>
<p>Commonwealth–academically in the same league with BUA for the best in Boston. Situated in a huge double townhouse on Comm Ave in Back Bay–It has brilliant but quirky kids --and brilliant but quirky teachers. Amazing head. If two or three students get together they can petition a teacher to give them a course (Sanskrit several years ago, for example…) Lots of sports waivers. Surprisingly good arts for the size of the school. Step inside for a visit and within minutes you will either thing you have found home or leave quickly.</p>
<p>BUA–Academically the strongest school in Boston (less intellectually quirky than Commonwealth). Kids can start classes at BU as early as 9th grade and by 12th grade take just about all of their classes there–they use BU library as its library. Classical curriculum with the Triduum in 9th grade and mandatory Latin or Ancient Greek for first two years. Happy to give sports waivers for kids who are on club teams. Poor arts. Terrific head–probably the best in Boston. I get the sense that the admissions department can spot a BUA kid–as they are a different breed. Very very intense and very small (40-45 kids a year). Like Commonwealth you will not have mixed feelings about BUA.</p>
<p>Rivers–has been trying to get out of being peoples’ back-up school and has tried to raise its academic profile but not yet there. Top flight music program (a notch below Walnut Hill but otherwise best in Boston), excellent athletics. </p>
<p>Boston College High-- Jesuit school–'nuff said. Many Boston leaders are “Eagles” (or if went to BC for college “Double Eagles” or if also Law School “Triple Eagles”). On the waterfront so difficult commute during rush hours. </p>
<p>Milton–I have a prejudice here–everytime I have visited it I have never liked it. The kids seem like they go to “Chilton” of the Gilmore Girls–they are driven, status and career oriented but with little intellectual heft. It has an excellent college (esp Harvard) placement–but one gets the impression that for everyone there that it is a way station to the next plaudit rather than a destination in of itself–but again, I just don’t like the place.</p>
<p>St Sebs–it is trying to match its athletic prowess with academic power but that is an unfinished area of work. It is in Needham so a bit out of the city off 128. </p>
<p>Concord–this school makes me very sad. it WAS a wonderfully artsy, Quaker-like (NB: it is not a Friends school), progressive school. About 6 years ago the board hired the former number two at Milton (who go turned down for the Milton top job) and he has gotten rid of its charm. Now it is just another school—a number of the arts faculty have felt or riding time out until retirement–it actively seeks athletes in the admissions process and the progressive nature of the school is quickly being snuffed out. So sad.</p>
<p>CSW–progressive school uses the block system. Academics are much better than they were but still not in the top tier of Boston schools. Sports? Other than Ultimate frisbee–I dunno. Has an undeserved reputations (true a decade or so ago) as a stoner school–now drug culture is no better or worse than elsewhere. Kids who go here are very happy–but it is very self-selected group. You will know immediately if you should stay for the tour.</p>
<p>Anyway those are some idiosyncratic thoughts.</p>