<p>People seems to <em>assume</em> NYU must be good at econ because of its location. But if I remember correctly, it's actually ranked <em>below</em> UCLA and UCSD.</p>
<p>woah almost like de ja vu I asked this same ? like over a yr ago in a really old thread. Ok now to ranking, well what I learned from those kind ppl who posted over there was:
UC Berkely
UCLA
NYU
Emory
UCSD
USC
Georgetown
UWashington
UCI
ASU</p>
<p>all these school are amazing though, don't get caught up in their minor differences in rank.</p>
<p>Actually, most rankings put NYU in the top ten these days, with strength in macro and financial economics. It's a tossup between UCLA and NYU in a lot of areas, but I'd say that UCSD is clearly weaker in most things but econometrics, in which they generally are considered excellent. </p>
<p>But again, departmental rankings are not always the best indicator of undergrad training. I'd choose a top LAC over UCSD for undergrad educational quality any day.</p>
<p>Georgetown is, at best, a top 50 department in econ. It does not even begin to compare to UCLA and UCSD for overall economics department strength.</p>
<p>If I had to be pressed to do an absolute ranking (a sticky and somewhat silly affair), then...</p>
<p>UC Berkeley
UCLA/NYU
UCSD
USC
ASU
Washington
Irvine
Emory</p>
<p>This is, of course, based on publication strength, and a variety of other academic factors. THIS IS NOT AN ACCURATE RANKING FOR UNDERGRAD EDUCATIONAL STRENGTH.</p>
<p>The entire notion of an "undergrad economics department" is flawed. It's like arguing statistics when your p-value is .5-- meaningless.
ASU</p>