Agree! Glad you have these connections! It helps to have a mentor who is younger, as the field has changed dramatically since the match started. We also have a family friend in the field, and she is young. My daughter has friends who are currently in programs, and she currently works with GCs. She also belongs to a GC group consisting of current applicants, current students, and recent grads.
Those numbers are deceiving and are actually better than what you are reporting IF you get interviews. There are about 2000 applicants each year for just over 500 spots (new programs opened this year). About half of those 2000 do not receive any interviews at all. Last year, from the 1000 applicants who did receive interviews, about half matched (51%). Those with more interviews had more success, and those with at least 4 interviews had more success. There is a lot of data out there regarding current match statistics, and the group she belongs to breaks it down nicely.
The process is extremely stressful. It helps to apply to a lot of programs because that increases your chances for getting interviews, but the process is time consuming, lots of essays etc. My daughter spent 8 months working on her applications, but it paid off because she received a lot of interviews. Also, different schools look for different things. One school might value work experience, while another school wants somebody who published, while other programs value lab work or those who were teachers etc. There is a lot of research that is involved just when choosing schools. It is very important to write an outstanding personal statement and to have the best letters of recommendation, because that is what helps you get the interviews, in addition to the CV. A “good” but not “wow” personal statement will not cut it (lots of subjectivity here). This is also one degree that is really based on program fit, as well as maturity. It’s really crazy, tbh.
Agree that one has to be able to analyze data, enjoy science and love genetics, as well as enjoy counseling and teaching, etc. And yes, diversity in cohorts is important, but keep in mind that half apply while in undergrad, and half have worked (teachers, researchers, bartenders, etc). It’s not the job or career that matters, but rather the transferable skills that you learn (teaching, collaborating, problem solving etc) and many, many careers will set you up for that. Diversity of cohort is program dependent. Collaboration and working well on teams comes up during interviews, and successful applicants need outstanding interview skills, need to have stories to tell, etc.
It’s a process, and a stressful one at that!