<p>Momma-three, I agree 100% with your last post.</p>
<p>But I have a point to make about Jersey Shore costumes and in general a point to make to all of the people who are trying to belittle the wrongness of what occurred here at Lehigh.</p>
<p>Jersey shore costumes are not analogous to the white males dressing up as black females for SEVERAL very important reasons.</p>
<p>One, there is the issue that these white males painted their faces black. We’ve already discussed blackface.
Two, these males are privileged 1. because they are white and 2. because they are males. To choose strong black females as the object of a ridiculous imitation is particularly troubling, and then to be in the historical position of power in terms of your race and gender when it comes to the subject of the joke, that is even more troubling.</p>
<p>Dressing up as Jersey shore characters is generally a lot more nuanced. 1. the show is seen as a joke, so it’s more analogous to people dressing up as characters from well-known blacksploitation films or something like that, rather than analogous to someone dressing up as real-life athletes 2. generally the people that dress up as these characters are of the same race, body type, and gender of the “joke”. That means there’s less pulling on the historically privileged/historically oppressed strings. Actually, Snooki isn’t even Italian. She’s adopted.</p>
<p>Is a non-Italian/person not from Jersey dressing up as Snooki a little insensitive/tasteless? Yes, I would say so, though it’s a fair point that it’s awfully hard to tell if someone is not Italian or not from New Jersey. It’s a lot easier to tell if someone is black, and that speaks to the fact that constructs around black identity (often negative) are still much more powerful than constructs around Italian identity. </p>
<p>In conclusion, a Snooki or The Situation costume is not AS tasteless as two white dudes painting their faces black, stuffing their shirts, and imitating black female athletes. </p>
<p>I agree that Italians put up with a lot of ****, especially in terms of the media portrayal of them, but I don’t agree that the comparisons being made by some posters are logical at all. There’s a clear “more wrong” here.</p>