<p>i cant specifically address the campus culture at brandeis because ive never been there. however, i can unequivocally state that bucknell is not a place where one would have to worry about friends only worrying about partying. there are stereotypical frat parties, no doubt. there are also the 'parties' that arent really parties out all, but merely a half dozen people hanging out together, having a few drinks. and there are the 'crazy' anime society meetings, too; in my undergraduate days, that club was nearly 100 members strong.</p>
<p>(and yes, i do feel a strong need to defend the negative characterizations of bucknell because, simply, theyre inaccurate. if all bucknell had to offer was a social scene involving frat parties, id have transferred after my freshman year.)</p>
<hr>
<p>anyway, as a mathematics major and current graduate student in theoretical mathematics (specifically foundations... logic, set theory, proof theory and a bit of computational complexity theory on the side), i take somewhat strong offense to the naive suggestion that it doesnt matter where one studies mathematics. frankly, im not sure i can think of a major where it matters more. why?</p>
<p>theoretical, proof-based math is really hard... hard to the point where even most highly intelligent princeton math majors find the ho-holds-barred approach their department takes to be too demanding and consequently leave for 'easier' fields. as one meanders down the academic food chain, increasing amounts of 'sugar-coating' works its way into the curriculum simply to keep more than a handful of students afloat. it happens at bucknell. it happens even more at places like penn state and maryland. and im sure it happens even more yet at schools with, on average, even less capable students.</p>
<p>now, i dont know how much sugar-coating occurs at brandeis. the school certainly has a highly qualified faculty and draws strong students. however, there is relatively little in the way of outcomes to suggest an undergraduate program that is particularly strong.</p>
<p>take, for example, the fact that bucknell produces phds in mathematics and statistics at TWICE the rate of brandeis. this is a somewhat disappointing outcome for a school with a strong faculty and presumably 'headier' student body. however, in context, i dont find it particularly surprising.</p>
<p>despite brandeis having a phd program in mathematics, bucknell actually holds the larger of the two departments. considering then the fact that brandeis is home to approximately three dozen graduate students, the difference in faculty access and dedication to undergrads could potentially be quite large. and in a field where it can take hours to make any grounded progress on a line of thinking, having a faculty dedicated to undergraduate instruction is critical.</p>
<p>my strong recommendation of bucknell as a place to study mathematics isnt coming from left field, either. in addition to the aforementioned difference in phd production (in which bucknell ranks 52nd nationally in the ABSOLUTE number of phds produced and 21st among private schools of ANY size), bucknell has also performed very well in the highly prestigious putnam mathematics competition, even finishing in the top 10 in north america in 2004. the putnam is a BIG deal, and for a team from bucknell to beat out teams from places like uchicago and michigan, along with 400 or so other schools, speaks to the quality of instruction at the school.</p>
<p>...of course, it doesnt hurt that department served me very, very well, either. that i am currently studying mathematics at a top 20 (or so) graduate department in a highly competitive field speaks volumes to the education i received.</p>
<p>if you have more specific questions about math (or social life!) at bucknell, feel free to let me know either here or via pm. knowing the time-sensitive nature of waitlist admissions, ill try to respond in a timely fashion.</p>