<p>Thanks for the comments, but here is the thing.</p>
<p>My first action was to go to their office and discuss the issue directly. I was quickly brushed off after the counselor would not even attempt to understand what my request was, and told to write an email instead.</p>
<p>And actually, there is extra scholarship available. As I was told by a counselor, if your parental contribution is low or zero, you get an extra 2400$/per year, which covers the insurance, and can be used to offset the need to get a job during the year. Students benefiting from this policy pay exactly what their offer was. I currently pay what I offered plus 2500$ from student employment.</p>
<p>For the following, please keep in mind that for international students, parental contribution is usually offered by the parents/student based on common sense, good will and desire to increase chances, not calculated by brown.</p>
<p>Now, my argument was that although my parental contribution is higher, it simply does not reflect my economic status. I chose to offer more than 100% of my family’s whole life savings, while others do not offer more than 50%, and this has been interpreted as my family being richer. This interpretation is what I am trying to tell them is wrong.
If person A has 20.000$ savings, and offers 2.000$ per year, they will get the extra 2400. If B has 40.000 savings, with similar income, and offers 12.000 per year, they do not get the extra money. This is where my confusion lies.
If their policy was intended to help poorer families, would it not be more reasonable to base eligibility on actual conditions, and not on contribution? Is this not a waste of university funds? If they are giving the money anyway, why not give it to the lower savings/income families as calculated after paying all debts to brown?</p>
<p>Now the responses I got where completely stupefying. Disregarding the fact that they treat me like I’m trying to escape the responsability of paying the full sum I offered.
They said that I, being an international student, have a fixed contribution upon which my admittance was based, and that they cannot take money from another student’s scholarship just to give me extra cash.
This is false for two reasons.
-all the students I know that are receiving this scholarship, are international and have been admitted based on their contribution, and yet now they pay less
-all the students I know that receive this scholarship had to request it. it wasn’t simply given to them by the finaid office out of good will. the office knowingly hid this from them, until directly notified. so it is not like the funds they allocate are fixed and can never be changed, as I was told.</p>
<p>So my question is: why is my contribution treated differently? Why am I told that their whole universe is based upon what I offered, yet other students receive the money upon simple email request? And more importantly, why could it be so hard for them to :
a)prove me wrong
b)apologize for their misinterpretation, but also for their procedural incapability to offer me the money although I am correct
c)just give me the money, as giving it to me is no different than giving it to someone else, if that someone else happens to need it less</p>