<p>The off-topic discussions about what was and wasn't implied have got to stop. They water down and sour an otherwise healthy discussion about the differences between Cornell and Brown. And, quite frankly, they are embarrassing for all parties involved. </p>
<p>Gomestar: Your numbers are probably a bit biased upwards. I'm not certain the freshman class retention rate can be applied to all class years as a measure of students transferring out, and even then, it probably shouldn't be applied to the junior or senior classes. For Brown, around 35-40 freshman don't return every year. I don't know how many of those are transferring out as opposed to just dropping out. </p>
<p>Sleph: You make some good points, especially in regards to the ability to actually compare the two schools. But why you would be surprised (let alone make fun of) that somebody might be accepted into Brown but not Cornell is beyond me. The admissions game for a lot of schools is a crap shoot.</p>
<p>I'm also going to have to disagree with you on the meaning of the placement numbers. Such numbers are incredibly hard to compare because there is no basis for consistent comparisons across schools. Brown may have more alums at HLS (a claim which I don't know to be true), but you will need to control for the number of alums applying to HLS or even interested in law school, as well as the quality of the students. This is why rankings like the Wall Street Journal's are fundamentally flawed.</p>
<p>Another thing to consider: Cornellians are a a lot more socio-economically diverse than the kids at Brown. For this reason, they may rule out expensive law or med schools altogether, unwilling to take on the debt. A lot of my friends at Cornell with insanely high GPAs and test scores ended up at places like SUNY-Buffalo or SUNY-Downstate even though they get into "better" programs. Are you going to hold this against them?</p>
<p>Finally, you are right about Brown and Fulbrights. Brown is incredibly successful in obtaining Fulbrights... close to 40% of students who apply get a Fulbright at Brown. But Cornell's rate (around 30%), isn't anything to sneeze at either, and rivals most other schools. But Fulbrights aren't necessarily the best indicator of "academic seriousness" either. Academically serious students can do a lot of things: go on to manage a hotel, get a masters degree in engineering, or become a social worker. All are things that Cornell students do. </p>
<p>In terms of students who go on to get PhDs, Cornell and Brown are about the same... around 9% of all grads go on to get a PhD. That might be the best available measure of "academic seriousness".</p>
<p>But I still maintain for the original poster: Go to Brown. Give it a fair shot. You will probably like it and stay there. It's a good school. I just tend to favor the more dynamic and down-to-earth Cornell experience.</p>