<p>The farce that is club membership at our high school has just gotten worse. Club and sports both meet after school during the same block of time. As it was, kids were somehow managing to be in two places at once, or in neither place at all, and yet were still claiming membership. Unfortunately, the honest student who was actually committed to attending meetings and practices was sometimes penalized for local awards and scholarships because it appeared s/he was less involved than the faker. The abuses became rampant, folks complained, and so the school instituted an attendance standard of 50% for clubs. While this is an improvement over what was, IMO that standard is ridiculous. Can you just go to work 50% of the time? Is it acceptable to only attend class 50% of the time? Should you only parent 50% of the time? Anyway, some club advisors skirted the new rule and allowed their pets to miss meetings and events without an attendance penalty.</p>
<p>But now, clubs whose membership is below a certain number of students will be eliminated next year in order to save money. So, teachers have allegedly begun allowing students to sign in to club meetings and then leave. This way, kids can be "involved" without really doing anything, and in return the teachers keep their membership numbers high enough so their club survives and they don't lose their advisor's stipend.</p>
<p>I hear similar horror stories from parents at other schools. Of course, elite colleges are looking for more than mere membership; they want impact or demonstrable results which are easier to verify. Still, the vast majority of kds aren't applying to the Ivies and top LAC's. Isn't it about time colleges put less emphasis on EC's? Kids think adcoms want to see EC's, but many don't have the time or interest to really do them, and this nonsense is the result. Membership and club involvement is too hard to verify for the ordinary drone.</p>