<p>The cover of the latest Time magazine shows this "extremely" ambitious: "How To Build a Student For the 21st Century." My personal opinion is that the writers missed the issues by a wide margin as the article is a painful hodgepoge of wishful thinking, misleading information, and biased research. In so many words, a typical Time article. Unfortunately, the cover story is only available to suscribers, so you'll have to spend a few nickels to find out. </p>
<p>On the other hand, a side story does present an interesting twist on the issue of reinventing our schools. </p>
<p>
[quote]
Throughout most of the 20th century, the stream of cars rolling off Michigan assembly lines created jobs with high wages and schools with low expectations. When even a kid who dropped out of school early could look forward to a cozy middle-class living, mastering chemistry, geometry or geography didn't seem so important. But now, at the start of the 21st century, both the state's leading industry and its school system are at a crossroads. </p>
<p>While the once innovative industry is struggling to find a new direction, the state's schools have moved into the fast lane of educational reform. "The collapse of the auto industry, which also exploded the notion embedded in the DNA here that you can make a good living despite being a high school dropout, created a perfect storm for convincing everyone we needed to make changes," says Michael Flanagan, Michigan's superintendent of public instruction. For three months last fall a task force of state education officials, school superintendents, college deans and a Ford Motor Company executive pored over scholarly research on curriculum reform, borrowed ideas from private schools with strong college preparatory curricula and International Baccalaureate programs that infuse instruction with a global perspective. The panel also studied the education policies in countries such as Singapore, whose students routinely ace international proficiency exams. And the group consulted education chiefs from states that were early adopters of tougher standards, including Indiana, Oregon and Arkansasall of which require four years of English and at least three years of math and science.
[/quote]
</p>