<p>So, I am a junior looking at some colleges. Sadly, I have only visited some state schools, and as a whole I am shooting for some top-tier institutions. Sadly, my parents are not quite as supportive of this (They have told me,and I understand, that they will only pay for the cost of a public state university), so I have not gotten the chance to even visit some other schools. So, all of my research has come from some brochures, and the internet. I think maybe one of the foolish mistakes I made was using "The Princeton review" for some things, such as bad dorms, bad city, etc. These are some of the discrepencies I have come across.</p>
<p>In addition, I have heard that for OOS public-schools, you will get very little financial aid, nonetheless loan-free (which is what I am mostly looking for).</p>
<p>Duke University- "More to do on campus"/"town gown relations strained" (bad town relations? I don't see the relevence)
MIT (Sloan)- Ugly campus
Harvey mudd- ugly campus
University of Chicago- people say it's a "nerd" college, with no social scene
Dartmouth College- "students dissatisfied with financial aid", but I have also read as of 2008-2009 year, and beyond, they are becoming a no-loan financial aid school
WUSTL- I hear they give poor need-based financial aid
Johns Hopkins- "professors get low marks"
Carnegie Mellon- "is it food"?
USC- bad area of LA (this I can definetly see....same with Johns Hopkins)
Amhearst- "Students dissatisfied with financial aid"
Vassar- "More to do on campus"/"town gown relations strained"
College of the Holy Cross- "more to do on campus", "dissatisfied with financial aid"</p>