<p>(That) I (have little interest) in art is not the fault of my parents, (taking) me to art exhibits and galleries from the time (I was) ten years old. No error.</p>
<p>Error is (taking) and I've searched online and people keep saying it is ambiguous that it should be "who took". How can it be ambiguous, the only noun the phrase can modify is parents because, logically, you can't take yourself anywhere :/</p>
<p>Another</p>
<p>(Determined) to make a name (for herself) (as a writer) of short stories, Helen never submits anything to an editor until (revising) it several times. No error.</p>
<p>The error is at "revising" and I'm not too sure why.</p>
<p>The word "revising" is the present participial of "to revise" and so technically, the sentence means "until she revises it several times" Why is this wrong? I don't understand.</p>
<p>If this is wrong, I can't think of a reason why this is correct:</p>
<p>Politicians "entering" politics believe that money is more important than morals. </p>
<p>The word "entering" means "who enter" and is the present participial of "to enter'. The two examples are the same... I'm so confounded regarding gerunds, participials, and infinitives...</p>
<p>please help!</p>