<p>Im a math major and I am prepared for one class but the other one is a complete blank. I am a little worried but I will be attending a lot of office hours to make up what I dont know.</p>
<p>north campus majors have no right to complain :rolleyes:</p>
<p>wow, these readings are for also applicable to students that WERENT transfers right? im currently considering going to a cc and transferring to LA, so i'm curious if these class you are taking necessary for only transfers?</p>
<p>They're just talking about general class assignments, which everyone (transfers and four year students) would need to do. There is no single class that one must take as a transfer at UCLA. It depends entirely on one's major and their class selections, the professor teaching the class, etc.</p>
<p>gotcha, thankss</p>
<p>I second what allie said... most UCLA students aren't that smart, not to sound like a pompous piece of poo</p>
<p>it took me like 1 hour to do one math problem.</p>
<p>its very very sad</p>
<p>what class are you taking malishka?</p>
<p>diff eq, lin alg, and econ 11.</p>
<p>the 1 hour took for diff eq. i dont get it for some reason. i think i am missing some critical diff eq concept. </p>
<p>actually yesterday i kept trying to figure out what is y' ...</p>
<p>apparently i conviently forgot everything over the summer.</p>
<p>hehe. which lin alg are you taking?</p>
<p>Citan,</p>
<p>Even though the WORK for south campus is harder, the time management needed to handle the large amounts of reading for most north campus majors is harder. 1000 pages a week for a class is hard for anyone, even you super-smart southies.</p>
<p>Oh, and don't worry recent transfers. You'll get the hang of it.</p>
<p>33a, the first one.</p>
<p>i partly wish i took it in CC, it would have been sooooooo much easier.</p>
<p>Nah its the same. It probably would have made it easier. Im taking the upper division lin alg and its almost the same as the CC class I took.</p>
<p>well i havent looked at the lin alg yet. THe diff equations is the one i have issues with. </p>
<p>i want to change majors, ia m pretty much not into math anymore</p>
<p>Diff equations? Meh. Those aren't bad. It's integrals that suck.</p>
<p>I'd feel prepared if I weren't so lazy. :rolleyes:</p>
<p>
[quote]
I second what allie said... most UCLA students aren't that smart
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Based on what I've observed so far, UCLA students, on average, are incredibly smart, as well as knowledgeable and hard working. Tonight I met some graduate students at an on-campus club. One of them did his undergrad at Harvard and the other was admitted into Columbia and Harvard for grad school, but chose to do his graduate work here for financial reasons. This shouldn't be suprising, since as we all know, UCLA is a very selective place and only the best students are accepted here.</p>
<p>^athletes... :rolleyes:</p>
<p>It's not that they're not that smart. It's just that they're no smarter than transfers, just because they had high SATs 4 years ago or because they've been here longer or whatever. There are going to be smart people and less smart (even if it's just common senseish smart) people at any school. </p>
<p>I just meant to say that it's totally silly for transfers to think that everyone at UCLA is brilliant. We have plenty of very very smart people, but we also have plenty of...normal...people. You'd be surprised how many people can get far in life by BSing and by not needing to be particularly smart.</p>
<p>I hope I can find someone "normal" to prove myself wrong.
So far, I've met plenty of people who came to UCLA from top 10 universities for financial reasons.</p>