Students may have no experience in the foreign language they take at level 1, it doesnât mean they donât have any previous foreign language experience.
For instance, most HS offer Spanish. A student who wanted to study French or Korean or Norwegian or Russian or Italian or Swahili in HS⊠couldnât. So, they took Spanish to fulfill their HS graduation requirement/college entrance requirement, but in college they take the language they really wanted to take all along, and take 2 or 3 semesters of French or Korean or Norwegian or Russian or Italian or Swahili. They start at level 1 because they never took it before, but they do have skills from previous language study. Then they follow the sequence till they meet their graduation requirement (vast majority) or till theyâve met other goals (such as grad school entrance recommendations or personal interest).
The college graduation FL requirement isnât âsince they have no FL HS experienceâ but rather to assess proficiency: you can reach level 3 by taking 1 course at level 3, 2 courses levels 2 and 3, or 3 courses levels 1, 2, 3, depending on personal choices and previous study. Students who take Level 1 typically havenât studied that language previously. Students who take Level 2 typically have taken 2 or 3 years in HS (depending on the college and the rigor of its FL sequence) or have knowledge through other means. Since you took Level 1, you would logically know students who didnât take that specific language previously but in Spanish 3 your observations would be different. (I did read you know students who didnât take FL in HS.)
Considering the vast majority of US (and international) HS require FL through elementary level for a college-ready HS diploma to be awarded, I âdidnât take FL in HSâ may mean lots of things, such as âtook it in MSâ, âwas in immersionâ, âam a heritage speakerâ, âscored a 4 on FL AP freshman yearâ, âmoved here from abroadâ, not "I knew nothing in âFLâ before I got to âhighly selective collegeâ ". Those who truly didnât study any FL at the secondary level are a tiny minority at most highly selective colleges. I am sure you know an equal number who âplaced outâ of their FL graduation requirement to those who had no previous knowledge whatsoever (different from âstarted at level 1 at Dartmouthâ) and in real numbers those who âplace outâ far, far outnumber those who had no previous knowledge whatsoever.
You should feel proud you got into Dartmouth without a FL because you are certainly exceptional.
Iâll stop here because this side discussion is derailing the thread.
(However, you should know that if I was âcalled@â to this thread wrt to the OPâs foreign language situation, itâs because I do know these colleges and I know a lot about FL education at the HS and college levels.)
@fishergy:
Class rank and GPA make you a slam dunk for PSU-DUS, Pitt, and Temple Honors (Pitt focuses more on test scores, PSU more on GPA/rigor). Schreyer and Smeal are too selective to predict but DO apply as you stand a chance. For Smeal, evaluate whether youâd qualify for Sapphire (if so, mention youâd be interested in Sapphire in your statement; if not , consider applying DUS.)
URichmond is a reach, so you need more matches. Consider Dickinson and Denison (âInternational managementâ and âGlobal Commerceâ majors are their business majors). Start showing interest.
Can you consider Economics rather than Business? Itâd open more possibilities but the subjects and the way the majors are structures would be quite different.