I’m looking to apply to a couple of reach schools and I’d like an objective point of view regarding my chances at said reach schools. (I realize these are incredibly selective schools so I do have a few safeties and matches that I am applying to, but I won’t be listing them here.)
Harvard EA
(Or Stanford EA. I have not decided yet. Lucky me.)
MIT
Yale
Brown
Princeton
UChicago
UC Berkeley
UCLA
CalTech
Barnard
Okay. Here’s a brief rundown of my stats:
(sorry I don’t really want to go into detail for privacy reasons, but I’d be open to private messaging anyone if they desire)
34 ACT
5s and 4s on 7 AP tests, taking 6 tests this year
SAT IIs: 750 lit, 760 bio, 720 math 2
4.0 UW GPA, top 10%
Competitive public high school
Typical ECs, nothing special; involved in a social activism club, stem club, lit mag, and a sport (not being recruited)
I participated in TAS.P this past summer
Teacher #1 rec will be stellar (we’re very close, they wrote my rec for TA.SP), Teacher #2 doesn’t know me that well but I did well in their classes. I anticipate the counselor rec will be decent/good, we talk a lot.
Not sure how to “rank” my essays objectively, and quite frankly I feel weird even attempting to do so.
I predict you’ll get accepted by Barnard and denied by MIT and Caltech. I can’t predict the rest as I can’t tell from your post what majors you are applying for. Can you list what three majors you plan to put on your Yale application?
@hamilton_ebooks It will be harder to get into Harvard early. If I recall correctly, their accepted class this year was around 30% alumni, whereas Stanford’s percentage was much lower. I think you have a good shot at Stanford (over Harvard) given that you don’t have legacy at Harvard.
As a non-resident of California, you won’t get priority and you won’t get a dime at the publics. So if the UCs are a goal, plan on paying $60K per year.
I agree with @hodge812 and @Testingearly that Caltech and MIT won’t happen. They reject perfect scores. Your EC’s don’t stand out, so the HYPS are out.