<p>Definitely read this article:</p>
<p><a href=“Young, Gifted, and Not Getting Into Harvard - The New York Times”>Young, Gifted, and Not Getting Into Harvard - The New York Times;
<p>It reinforces the point that you could do absolutely everything right and still not be admitted to Harvard or any other highly selective school. You need to come to terms with this point not only to prevent future disappointment but also to liberate yourself in the present moment: as “Applying Sideways” suggests, there is almost nothing that will guarantee you admission to MIT, so you might as well do what makes you tick. The way to find what makes you tick in no way involves asking about what other people do. </p>
<p>Despite the points I just made, I’ll “bite” and give you some more info. </p>
<p>There really are no specific “steps” beyond achieving academic, extracurricular, and personal excellence. All elite colleges will tell you that there’s no formula for admission. In all reality, admission offices aren’t supposed to give students directions about how to get in; instead, they serve as talent scouts with the best interest of the institution in mind. Because the pools at schools like Harvard are so good (90% of applicants are qualified to do the work and 50% are qualified to do the work at an honors level), a lot of the selection process comes down to highly subjective factors (how they ‘feel’ when reading your app) and is difficult to predict.</p>
<p>If you want to make admission very likely, you’ll have to be a recruited athlete, the child of a major donor/famous person, and/or the child of a faculty member. </p>
<p>If you want more info about whom Harvard admits, watch this:
<a href=“Harvard Admissions Dean Fitzsimmons Interview (On Harvard Time) - YouTube”>Harvard Admissions Dean Fitzsimmons Interview (On Harvard Time) - YouTube;
<p>Basically, if you don’t have any of the aforementioned ‘hooks,’ then you can maximize your changes by being ‘very unusual academically’ (as evidenced by winning academic competitions and having ‘best in career’ recommendations, not just by getting good grades/scores) or by having ‘some type of distinguishing excellence’ (national/international champion of something). If you can do neither of these (which is the case for most people), then simply strive to be what Fitz calls a ‘good all-arounder’: strong academically, extracurricularly, and personally. Most people in the pool are good all-arounders, so by becoming one you are by no means guaranteeing admission. However, you would be maximizing your chances. How do you become a good all-arounder? Do well in the classroom, do what you love outside of the classrom and do it really well, and be a genuinely nice person. Which is the advice offered in Applying Sideways.</p>
<p>By the way, you mentioned in post #31 that Harvard is the “most selective college in the USA.” Actually, the most selective undergraduate program at a major research university for the Class of 2017 was Stanford: 5.69% admit rate v. Harvard’s 5.8% admit rate.</p>