<p>ACT: 32 Composite (35E, 33M, 28R, 32S)
SAT II: Chemistry 770, Math 2: 740
AP US History: 4, Chemistry: 5, Macroecon: 5, US Gov: 5</p>
<p>AP Courses: AP US History, AP Chemistry, AP Macroeconomics, AP Chemistry - Junior yr.
Senior yr: AP English, AP Biology, AP Physics C, AP Calculus AB, AP Psychology</p>
<p>Worked Blood Pressure and Blood glucose checks at Community health faires (Red Cross)
Volunteering at Hospital (100-150 hrs)
Summer Research Program, very prestigious (about 300 hours)
Shadowed IM doctor, Anesthesiologist (>25 hrs)
Taught Sunday School Classes (150-200 hrs)</p>
<p>Paid Work at hospice, office assistant (800-1000 hrs) (22 hrs/week) (junior year)
Paid Work in Hospital Lab Senior Year (20 hrs/ week) (senior year)
Worked at a mall (40 hrs/week for 3 months) (summer before junior year)</p>
<p>Founder and President of Chess Club
Vice President of National Honor Society
Big Brothers and Sisters program (set up programs with little kids to get them interested in science)
Student Council Representative (9th,10th)
Yearbook Editor (9th)</p>
<p>Very low income (20K-25K)
Asian American</p>
<p>please chance me...how should i improve etc?</p>
<p>Dude, from what I can see, you should have a better chance than anybody at getting in. There were very few areas which could be improved, it’s quite impressive. I would just say that higher SATs could possibly increase your chances (altho yours are quite high, and Stanford doesn’t look at numbers as much as most schools) and of course if you were a minority (hispanic or african-american) it would increase your chances, but nothing you can do about that. But people say that Stanford is very unpredictable, almost random, so there’s really no way to know.</p>
<p>Don’t fret it, if I were the admissions director, i’d accept you in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>You could do both of those things, since these are the relatively weaker parts of your application, as mentioned here.</p>
<p>Let’s put it this way. My S is applying even though his ECs are a bit weaker than yours in volunteerism (OTOH he’s a two sport athlete) but the rest of his stats are quite similar to yours.</p>
<p>Here is why I think the CC discussion board should be viewed as nothing more than mindless entertainment. I completely disagree with Asian75 on every statement he/she has made on this message board in the chance threads that I have viewed. I don’t know if I am wrong or he/she is wrong, but how can anyone tell for sure who is posting from a source of direct knowledge or just making stuff up.</p>
<p>It is impossible to predict who will be accepted or not at Stanford.</p>
<p>@cardfan: I dunno if you’re a Stanford student or just a fan of Stanford. Of course it’s possible to predict who will be accepted to Stanford unless someone is borderline . However, I am completely agree with you that CC discussion board should be view as entertainment but not “mindless”. I am sure most if not all ppl here put their thoughts into writing these comments.</p>