<p>So here I am, May 1st, the dreaded deposit deadline. I got into 5 schools:</p>
<p>University of Massachusetts - Amherst (In-state) (Cost minus loans: $10K)
University of Rochester ($51K)
Boston College ($57K)
Carnegie Mellon ($30K)
William & Mary (Out-of-state obviously) ($21K)</p>
<p>And I have narrowed it down to three; the three in the thread title. I love Rochester but I never felt like it stood out over the other three; it was always just a really good fallback. And I mean really good. But alas, they didn't give me too much cash and I have other options.</p>
<p>Anyway, here is where I stand. You may have noticed that BC is in the thread title even though they gave me $0 in grants and a measly $7000 in federal loans and work-study. I have gotten into many discussions on the BC board about their FA process and why it is so disappointing to me. I won't get into that here, but I should say that the only reason I get so passionate about it is because I love the school. I have essentially grown up on its campus watching everything from women's basketball to hockey since I was around 5. I an an obsessive Eagles fan, I know tons of people there and love them all, and I get this wonderful, inextricable sense of pride whenever I am on campus. I applied EA and thought I would end up there but as you can see, they have made that quite difficult. Even with my intense personal connection with BC, I find it extremely hard to justify spending an extra $30K per year (even though my parents have said they would be willing to cover a bit more if I chose BC) over two equally amazing universities. In my gut, I would probably not be able to turn down BC given an equal playing field (even if it was BC vs. Harvard), and people have told me that if I really want to go there in my heart, I could make it work. That is technically true. But is it worth the unnecessary effort?</p>
<p>The thing is, it would still be very hard to choose BC over the other two even on an equal playing field. Even though I love BC's beautiful and talented people, lively social life, athletic scene, and great location, it is a little preppy and it being literally a mile down the street from home, even though BC already is home to some extent, might be a little too much (especially if I were to live on Newton campus -- I live in Newton city). Plus, I'd like to get to some other part of the country and get that new experience.</p>
<p>So I think I can answer my own first question, which is whether I should even be considering BC. The consensus will probably be "no," and somewhere inside I think that is the case. Objectively, I can say I do not think it is worth an extra $25-30K over CMU or W&M, even if I could theoretically make a lot of sacrifices to make it happen. So even though it kills me, I don't think I will be going there. My question is: this makes sense, right? And I don't know if I would feel the same way about BC if I didn't have the longstanding relationship I do already. If I go somewhere else, do you think it would be possible in the future to keep that loyal allegiance to the school and the teams even though I turned it down? That looks like a stupid question even to me, but I think it is something that is really internally bugging me because I don't want to "betray" BC, or something.</p>
<p>Practically, then, it is down to William & Mary and Carnegie Mellon. I haven't mentioned yet that I am going to be majoring in Econ. I literally have no idea what I want to do with my life and don't give a **** about job placements or grad school acceptance rates or internship recruiters. I want to go to college to learn about and explore the things I love already, and discover things I don't yet. Let me get that out of the way.</p>
<p>Academically, I think both schools are awesome. CMU definitely has the "name brand" reputation (caveat: I promised myself "prestige" would not be a factor, but since I got in, I think it has sneakily influenced my thinking since I was not prepared to have people be really, genuinely impressed that I got into CMU. I think this has at least a little value.) but it's also refreshing to see W&M called "nerdy" since compared to CMU, it isn't, but compared to most public schools, it's definitely more intellectual. Which is great. As for econ programs, CMU's seems more real world applications/mathematics-based, whereas W&M's seems more theoretical and interdisciplinary, though how can I know that for sure unless I go there? I don't even know which I would prefer. They're both great; just... different. That is a common theme here. W&M supposedly has amazing professors in terms of teaching, which is a big plus, but CMU attracts big names in fields. Again, is one better than the other? I don't know. I think I prefer W&M slightly in this regard, but I'm sure the differences are negligible. I would be in H&SS at CMU, by the way, which I have heard is a joke; a double-major factory. I don't know whether this is true -- it didn't seem that way in person.</p>
<p>Here is the main dilemma. I'm different from most people I have seen on here in that my main goals in college are the one I said two paragraphs up and also to develop socially into a confident and outgoing person. Now, I am very shy/reserved in general and uncomfortable around people I don't know well. I am fine with close friends, but it is so hard to break down those barriers. In college, I think it would be helpful if I was at a place with a more communal feeling than being left to make the most of everything. Obviously that kind of independence is important for self-growth, but I think a little bit of help would be beneficial to me. At W&M, I got the feeling that it's an extremely friendly campus with overwhelming school pride and a kind, caring, family-like atmosphere. At CMU, it was definitely better on my visit than I thought it would be, but I am still worried about the techie nature of the school (i.e. antisocial rep) as well as inordinate lack of school spirit and although I'm so happy that CFA exists there, I'm worried that the different colleges might be a bit fragmented socially and even though different parts of me identify with techie types as well as artsy types (I don't really have a natural clique), it might be hard for me to branch out into different groups at CMU. H&SS is supposed to be a socially normal school with a roughly even male:female ratio, but, it still worries me that it will be hard to branch out. There might be <em>too much</em> independence, something that might have to do with the more open campus and urban location (which I think is PERFECT, by the way). Yes, it might be petty, but I want to feel confident when I'm talking to pretty girls. I want to have a core group of friends but feel like I could be friends with anyone on campus. The question is, how much hand-holding do I need and am I capable of achieving this social development on my own at a place like CMU? Or, maybe CMU is better in this regard than I thought? This is where I need help, because no matter how many things I like better on paper about CMU, I keep going back to the Tribe at W&M, both literally and figuratively. After all, they are one of the happiest student bodies out there.</p>
<p>Other factors: I love CMU's location and campus as I mentioned but W&M's is also very nice. It's in a pretty small town, however, and coming from right outside a big city (Boston), will I be reminded of this every day? Will the number of things to do on campus make me forget that I am in a 50% college student town? The money difference here is mostly irrelevant. Oh, and I am used to northeastern winters, so Pittsburgh won't be too hard to adjust to, but will it really make a difference if I go to VA and have a mild winter for once? I am pretty ambivalent towards cold and snow, but then again, I have never known anything different. I'm not big into greek life and not a big partier so I don't want that to be overwhelming, but it is nice once in a while. And I like that Pitt is right next to CMU. It might help with the social situation and male:female ratio, though I don't know how much students from the two schools interact, if at all.</p>
<p>I have exhausted pretty much every resource that I have in making this choice: visits (multiple to BC), online/paper guidebooks, crazy spreadsheets, and truly days of thought. I even did this online survey of deciding where to go and both schools score 138 (BC was 136). The only conclusion I have come to is that I love both schools; they are just different. And that's why it's so hard -- I don't know which one I would enjoy more, and no matter which I choose, I am giving up the experience of going to the other. The opportunity cost is freaking stratospheric. Yes, I'm an Econ major. And there are fewer than 22 hours left. Gah.</p>
<hr>
<p>Sorry for the novel. A brief summary:</p>
<p>I love BC and have all my life but they gave me no money.
-I should definitely drop BC, right?
-I would still be able to love BC even if I don't go there, right? (This, if "yes," will make it less hard to drop BC)</p>
<p>CMU and W&M gave me a lot of money but I can't decide.
Academics at both are outstanding but CMU might have better "prestige."
-Should I disregard this completely? Because it's hard to do even though I intended to.
I am an Econ major and can't tell which program would be better for me.
My primary goal is to grow socially and I don't know if that requires a big family-type of environment a la W&M.
-Will I feel at home at "nerdy," (and kind of artsy but potentially fragmented/polarized between them), low-spirit CMU, or are these all just big misconceptions? Will nearby Pitt mitigate these concerns?
-Is W&M's caring, communal environment with happy students a better fit?
-How much "hand-holding" (in terms of environment) do I need to feel more comfortable around others?
-Will I feel totally isolated at W&M and how much will this affect me daily? I'm used to the city, how hard is it to be in a more rural area?</p>
<p>-Am I totally misjudging anything here, whether it be my needs or my assessments of a particular school? Be honest.</p>
<p>I love both schools, but they are definitely different.
-Which is a better fit for me overall?</p>
<p>That's the $30,000 question right there. Any help is greatly appreciated. I don't know if I'll have some sort of epiphany today but time is short and I still feel like I might as well flip a coin.</p>